• dhtseany@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 days ago

    They promised us $45k trucks and delivered $100k trucks. No kidding it didn’t sell well.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      They actually did sell them discounted down to $50K.

      The reality is pickup drivers dont give a fuck about the environment.

      • Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I believe the Truck companies think people just want larger and larger trucks every year. I’m waiting until everyone is just driving monster trucks at this point lol

  • calliope@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 days ago

    It wouldn’t surprise me if Ford literally produced the vehicle because of subsidies.

    If they could get a portion of the EV tax breaks, they wanted it.

    Now that the current administration is obviously still obsessed with burning oil, it no longer matters.

  • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Large, heavy electric vehicles don’t make a lot of sense. The F-150 lightning was a neat idea, but smaller EVs make far more sense for personal vehicles.

    Electric vans would be much better as a work vehicle.

    Electric work trucks aren’t ready yet.

    • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lots of people need a truck, not a van. You can’t haul a couple cubic yards of top soil or gravel in a van. I see dozens of Lightnings in my area.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is a common argument, but the vast majority of people at home do not carry gravel or sand on a weekly basis. What they need is a rental truck for those items. The cost of 100k is ludicrous. Comparing to a rental truck you would need to be carrying raw material like that on average 2x a week to even break even with the payments.

  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not a fan of already huge trucks with giant heavy batteries all at head level to me in my 2002 subaru.

    • megopie@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      they’re gradually reducing the amount of vehicles sold while increasing the margin per vehicle. They’re approaching the limit of 1 vehicle sold at infinite margin.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If the F-150 Lightning wasn’t terrible and expensive, I might have bought one.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      What I wanted was a nice little ranger style truck - 2 seater, can pick up some lumber, decent sized bed, for in my garage. What they made was a giant crew cab monstrosity that takes up 2 parking spaces and costs 2x what I would have spent.

      Car companies keep trying to tell us customers what we want then are surprised when we don’t buy.