No

I don’t think so

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I have degoogled but YT is the only thing I’m stuck with. The monopoly is too much to overcome.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If you’re on mobile, check out the Greyjay app. It’s promoted (sponsored?) by Louise Rossman

        • Justifier@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Apparently there was some fallout with futo and him

          Not sure at all about the details, but yeah he definitely backed them. Not sure if he still does though

          • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I think he just left to go work on fulu, no bad blood as far as i’m concerned. Anyways grayjay is pretty good, and when the new newpipe comes out that might be an even better choice maybe (but who knows when that’ll be?? Tell me).

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Creating an infrastructure that could potentially ingest terrabytes of data per second, and then processing it into multiple resolutions, is a massive ask.

        Especially for a new site that might not ever get picked up by users, much less creators.

        I think the only people that have a hope in hell of having a success at starting a youtube competitor are the owners of the big porn sites, since they are in a similar, if much smaller than youtube business with regards to infrastructure demands and processing needs. . So they have the institutional knowledge and infrastructural inertia to get started easier than anyone else on the planet. assuming they want to do a SFW video site, which they may not want to do, and it’d probably be burdened forever with right wing outrage due to any tenuous, distant connection to the porn sites (even if its just porn money or porn owners)

        • tristynalxander@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 minutes ago

          Creating an infrastructure that could potentially ingest terrabytes of data per second, and then processing it into multiple resolutions, is a massive ask.

          Yeah, but that’s a bad approach.

          A website that just hosts links, a torrent to video script, and a like-button that’s a magnetic link is all you need to set up a youtube competitor. The creators can host their own videos, and their fans can help them. Sure there’s a lot of quality of life stuff that integrating a torrent client and browser would help with like automatically using file selection to host only the resolutions you watch up to or automatically deleting videos after a certain time unless you’ve extra likes them, but the underlying system is functional. For steaming, do whatever peertube is doing.

        • Talcosis@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Wasn’t there some professor that started uploading actual educational non-porn lectures on pornhub a while back?

          • da_cow (she/her)@feddit.org
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 minutes ago

            Afaik pornhub actually pays way more than YouTube. There are also lots of people uploading SFW content to the hub.

          • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            14 hours ago

            I think I know who you are talking about, I recall seeing something about her making more money posting on pornhub than youtube because of greater advertising sharing or something.

              • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                You make it sound nefarious, but its most likely just an ability to be more generous with the revenue sharing compared to something thats 300x its size.

        • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Yeah but hosting your self isn’t that big a deal depending on your host. At least until you get into the millions of views.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          21 hours ago

          is a massive ask.

          No, it’s not. It’s a massive request. When you punch out and leave the car lot, be sure to use regular English.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          17 hours ago

          it’s all crap and mindless shit anyways.

          If you click on mindless shit, the algorithm serves you mindless shit. I get documentaries. 🤷

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Well, you made a wrong claim that I merely corrected. Watch whatever wherever you want. Doesn’t change the fact that the documentary creators I follow for the vast majority only upload to YouTube and those that also upload to Nebula offer a worse experience there.

          • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            you know who else has documentaries?

            PBS.

            support your local public broadcasting stations, people.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              you know who else has documentaries?

              PBS.

              support your local public broadcasting stations, people.

              And do you know which documentaries they don’t have? The ones that are uploaded by their creators only to YouTube.

              I watch plenty of Arte and I pay the fee but documentaries about video game speedruns etc. simply aren’t on Arte (or PBS or Nebula). I watch those where they are: YouTube.

            • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Or turn on adblockers and support the people you watch directly (donate, patreon, merch, etc). It takes like $2/yr to replace the ad revenue that you would’ve generated for them (something like that).

              Or use the alt platforms that creators create themselves when possible.

              You can’t escape youtube right now (as in there is no real alternative if you stop using it all together), but you can turn on adblockers (ublock), use 3rd party clients and give something directly to creators you watch a lot.

              And you can support PBS in addition if you want.

    • plutopos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I tried using Konqueror once, but Cloudflare websites (like WineHQ) would verification loop me. Niche browsers are discriminated against