In the latest episode of “they will always sell you out” - they sold you out! Who would’ve thought.

Hoping for a good alternative client to appear, the writing is on the wall. Vaultwarden can’t exist without “leeching” off of Bitwarden.

  • Shortstack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 hour ago

    That’s troubling, I don’t like what this portends.

    The new CEOs background especially suggests they’re spiffing up the company for a later sellout, why else would they pick a merger specialist for the role?

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 minutes ago

    This is why corporate promises can never be trusted, because a new CEO can change those promises on a whim.

    It’s part of why despite being interested in Beeper, I never signed up for it because I had questions about if those privacy promises they made would be kept if they sold to a bigger company… which they eventually did.

    On the plus side they already made an official open source self-hosted version, which can be forked and/or return to the community developed Vaultwarden roots.

    Meanwhile KeepassXC keeps on chugging along.

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I think the original title was more helpful because it shows that this is a recent development. Maybe you can add “new CEO”?

    Bitwarden scrubs ‘Always free’ and ‘Inclusion’ values from its website as longtime execs step down

    In February, longtime CEO Michael Crandell moved to an advisory role, according to LinkedIn, with no announcement from the company. His replacement, Michael Sullivan, former CEO of both Acquia and Insightsoftware, touts his experience with “all facets of mergers and acquisitions” on his own LinkedIn page, including experience working with leading private equity firms.

    CFO Stephen Morrison also left Bitwarden in April, replaced by former InVision CEO Michael Shenkman. Both Crandell and Morrison joined the company in 2019. Kyle Spearrin, who started Bitwarden as a fun hobby project in 2015, remains the company’s CTO.

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 minutes ago

    Damn I guess I’m going back to keepass again since I am not really interested in hosting a vault

    • baduhai@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      It can, but vaultwarden, as it currently is, is an implementation of the server only. So if bitwarden decides to go closed source all the way, they’d haver to start either creating their own clients or fork the current bitwarden clients.

    • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      yeah fuck that… fuck subscriptions ALL OF THEM. fucn these companies, ALL OF THEM.

      stop giving any of these pricks any slack. none of them deserve it, nor money.

      today it’s 1.65… tomorrow it’s 4.99… next week it’s 12.99… stop being a mindless sheep giving them any sort of leeway. you’re enabling the scammers to literally scam you more, and more and more.

      I’m relocating all my shit right now because we’ll… fuck em. I am loyal to NO COMPANY. none of them deserve anything but bankruptcy at a minimum.

      • irmadlad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        today it’s 1.65… tomorrow it’s 4.99… next week it’s 12.99… stop being a mindless sheep giving them any sort of leeway. you’re enabling the scammers to literally scam you more, and more and more.

        ‘Mindless sheep’. That’s hilarious. But I get it. Nobody likes to pay for shit.

        • circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 minutes ago

          I mean, when we see the same pattern of endless subscription creep and price hikes on virtually every service… saying “but it’s only [insert dollars here]” does sound pretty out of touch.

          • irmadlad@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 minutes ago

            It’s not ‘out of touch’. It’s paying for (if it comes to that) a service that houses all of my business accounts, investment accounts, personal accounts, etc, and all with a pretty damn good track record. As with any technology, you must constantly evaluate it to see if what you are spending is justified for the service you are receiving. If at such time I feel the service isn’t worth the price, then sure. As of now, it’s not really an issue to me.

            • circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 minutes ago

              Sure. I think a lot of people just see that constant evaluation as postponing the inevitable, though (again, because the same pattern is everywhere). It’s not acknowledging that part which seems out of touch.

              • irmadlad@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 minutes ago

                There are a handful of things I do not self host.

                • arr stack
                • password managers
                • anything financial