ITT I learn that oligarch gabe nawel is the elon musk of gamers

  • JillyB@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    They take 30% of all PC game sales. If that isn’t abusing their position, idk what is.

    • JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      They allow devs to sell on other platforms and provide them steam keys for free, bypassing that commission.

    • TehPers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I see this point come up all the time when it comes to Steam, but I have yet to see anyone really propose an alternative. How much should it cost to host your game on Steam? It obviously can’t be free because of hosting costs, and you’re also paying for marketing and discoverability, so what’s a good price for it?

      Until recently, 30% was the industry standard for large software stores. Google is apparently lowering its cut after losing their recent battle with Epic, so it’s possible that the industry standard changes. I’d hope that Valve adjusts with it.

      • JillyB@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Valve’s cost of hosting is pennies. They’re one of the most profitable companies in the US. They could lower that number to 5% and still have plenty of margin, I’d bet.

        • TehPers@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Valve’s cost of hosting is pennies.

          Surely you can’t mean this literally. They host downloads of hundreds of GB that get served to tens of millions of users. The bandwidth costs alone are going to be insanely high, putting aside the storage costs as well.

          But anyway, I’d love to see them lower it to 5%. I think if they can afford to do that, they should take the lead.

          • cristian64@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I guess they meant “pennies per game sale”, in which case 30% could be quite a generous cut. But, of course, buyers can download the game many times, and forever, so it’s really hard to measure what’s a fair cut.

            To me, it’s not a monopoly because Steam doesn’t require exclusivity, and there are other stores (including physical a stores).