It gets my goat that people think it’s a good option. There are plenty of articles explaining some of the many issues with it, but a few are:

  1. It’s run by anti-LGBTQ+ crypto bros.
  2. It has ads right out of the box.
  3. It collected donations towards people who never signed up for them - then held them to ransom in exchange for the kind of information you should never share on the Internet.
  4. They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.
  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I will reject the misbehaving website rather than resort to using Chromium.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Your attitude is very reasonable. I strive to be as unreasonable as I can.

        reference

        “The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” ― George Bernard Shaw

        • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          This is hilarious for me if only because at some point ages ago I tagged you with, simply, “seems reasonable”.

          Fortunately, I also agree with your reasoning for being unreasonable, thus returning you back to the realm of reasonability while striving to be unreasonable.