It gets my goat that people think it’s a good option. There are plenty of articles explaining some of the many issues with it, but a few are:

  1. It’s run by anti-LGBTQ+ crypto bros.
  2. It has ads right out of the box.
  3. It collected donations towards people who never signed up for them - then held them to ransom in exchange for the kind of information you should never share on the Internet.
  4. They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.
  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Your attitude is very reasonable. I strive to be as unreasonable as I can.

    reference

    “The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” ― George Bernard Shaw

    • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      This is hilarious for me if only because at some point ages ago I tagged you with, simply, “seems reasonable”.

      Fortunately, I also agree with your reasoning for being unreasonable, thus returning you back to the realm of reasonability while striving to be unreasonable.