Bluesky post text is as follows:

Four days until release! Hollow Knight: Silksong will be available on 4th September.

Release times: 7AM PT | 10AM ET | 4PM CEST | 11PM JST

Game price: USD $19.99 | EUR €19.99 | JPY ¥2300

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    That’s the price of a little micro transaction in some other games. It will be worth, but I also feel kind of bad for the devs (or publisher). After so much time and work to produce (hopefully) a high quality game and then this cheap. Not complaining, but wondering if a higher price wouldn’t be too bad. I think 29,99 or 24,99 (the price of Factorio Edit: oh wait, I forgot Factorio costs 32 Euros here in Germany) would be totally acceptable in a time like this where AAA games come out at 79,99.

    • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      12 days ago

      There’s no publisher, they’re as indie as they come. The original prototype and game were made by burning through their savings, and it sold millions of copies, so they’re completely sheltered from need for the rest of their lives. Silksong is only adding to that wealth. I feel like they’re very decent people who succeeded because they love what they do, and are good at it.

      • Midnitte@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        12 days ago

        And by selling the sequel for basically the same price (adjusted for inflation), it seems like they’re using that wealth for good by pressuring greedy publishers to push prices down, not up.

        BL4 for $70 doesn’t seem like all that great of a deal when you might spend more time with a $20 game.

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          Im laughing at how many games changed their launch window away from silksong and instead are going against BL4.
          For some reason people arent seeing competition in Randy.

    • Lucy (PieFed edition) [she/faer]@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      12 days ago

      Low price doesn’t necessarily lead to less profit though, since the lesser the price, the more people who will be able to afford it. The devs probably want to get as many players as possible to play Silksong.

    • Ech@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      but I also feel kind of bad for the devs

      Why? They chose the price. They obviously think this is better than a $60+ price tag for a reason.

      *Out of curiosity, I checked the HK release price and it was $15 USD in 2015, which, adjusted for inflation, is ~$20 today. So this is a pattern with their games.

    • Vupware@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 days ago

      This price point makes impulse buys much more likely, which can make a huge difference when your game has so much hype.

    • Notyou@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 days ago

      Honestly with all the free dlc from Hollow Knight and Team Cherry already stating plans for future dlcs for Silksong, I would probably drop $60 without thinking. I love indie games way more than the AAA bullshit that gets released now.