This code would run a lot faster as a hash table look up.
Can you imagine being a TA and having to grade somebody’s hw and you get this first thing? lmao
Y’all laugh but this man has amazing code coverage numbers.
This joke was not written by the dude pictured. The author wrote a book of funny code jokes.
This is YandereDev levels of bad.
this is yanderedev.
pro hacker tip: you can optimize this by using “num” for the variable name instead of “number”
I prefer the cryptic each variable gets a single letter of the alphabet.
Plot twist: they used a script to generate that code.
To be fair, the question is “Write a function that simultaneously determines if the number is even and works as a timer”
def even(n: int) -> bool: code = "" for i in range(0, n+1, 2): code += f"if {n} == {i}:\n out = True\n" j = i+1 code += f"if {n} == {j}:\n out = False\n" local_vars = {} exec(code, {}, local_vars) return local_vars["out"]scalable version
Not even else if? Damn, I guess we’re checking all the numbers every time then. This is what peak performance looks like
O(1) means worst and best case performance are the same.
You don’t get it, it runs on a smart fridge so there’s no reason to change it
- a smart fridge’s monitor
I hope that the language’s
ints are at most 32 bits. For 8 bits it could even be written by hand & the source code for a 32 bit version would only take upavg_line_len * 4GiBspace for the source code of the function. But it might take a bit of time to compile a version that supports the full range of 64 or 128 bit ints.My mate, Paul, says all numbers after 700 repeat so we can stop there.
We just give them different names so you think they’re going up.
all you have to to is throw an exception if the number is bigger than 100, who even needs numbers that big anyways?
The end user yearns for their machine to be utilized fully, so instead of that, you can import full deepseek model to do the task
I’ll join in
const isEven = (n) => !["1","3","5","7","9"] .includes(Math.round(n).toString().slice(-1))I’ve actually written exactly that before, when I needed to check the lowest bit in an SQL dialect with no bitwise operators. It was disgusting and awesome.
That code is so wrong. We’re talking about Jason “Thor” Hall here—that function should be returning 1 and 0, not booleans.
If you don't get the joke...
In the source code for his GameMaker game, he never uses
trueorfalse. It’s always comparing a number equal to 1.Frankly, it’s what I did, too, after coming out of Uni-level C.
My code was goddamn unreadable.
It’s the same for a lot of people. Beginners are still learning good practices for maintainable code, and they’re expected to get better over time.
The reason people are ragging on PirateSoftware/Jason/Thor isn’t because he’s bad at writing code. It’s because he’s bad at writing code, proclaiming to be an experienced game development veteran, and doubling down and making excuses whenever people point out where his code could be better.
Nobody would have cared if he admitted that he has some areas for improvement, but he seemingly has to flaunt his overstated qualifications and act like the be-all, end-all, know-it-all of video game development. I’m more invested in watching the drama unfold than I should be, but it’s hard not to appreciate the schadenfreude from watching arrogant influencers destroy their reputation.
I am working with C in embedded designs and I still use 1 or 0 for a bool certain situations, mostly lines level.
For whatever pea-brained reason, it feels yucky to me to set a gpio to true/false instead of a 1/0.
GPIOs are usually controlled by a single bit of a register anyway. Most likely you need to do something like:
// Set high PORTB |= 1 << PINB5; // Set low PORTB &= ~(1 << PINB5);I am a lazy dev (not really, clients always want fast code), so I use the provided HAL libraries 99.9% of the time.
But I have seen code where someone would write something like
gpio_write(PIN_X, true)and it always stood out to me.
bool isEven(int value) { return (int)(((double)value / 2.0) % 1.0) * 100) != 50; }
