“Nuclear War: A Scenario” is a book about the scarcity of time, forcing readers to reflect on how close the world is to nuclear catastrophe. According to the vision presented by the book’s author, Annie Jacobsen, it becomes clear that in the event of a hypothetical nuclear conflict between the United States and North Korea, a global nuclear disaster would conclude within an hour.

Jacobsen’s depiction of the world paints a grim reality, showing readers what we should expect if the hands of the Doomsday Clock ever strike midnight. In shocking detail, the author describes how the world would be reduced to ashes in just 72 minutes.

When one considers that space-based infrared satellites can detect ballistic missile launches within seconds, and a North Korean intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) would take roughly 30 minutes to reach its target, the U.S. president would have only about six minutes after receiving a nuclear attack notification to launch around 400 Minuteman III ICBMs. The author divides this nuclear conflict scenario into three 24-minute segments, demonstrating just how little time it would take to turn “human genius and ingenuity, love and desire, compassion and intellect into ash.”

On the eve of the 80th anniversary of the first atomic explosion in the New Mexico desert—followed three weeks later by the first and only wartime use of nuclear weapons by the United States against Japan, namely the civilian populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki—this book lays bare the horrors of nuclear war.

  • stray@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I don’t mean to piss in the soup of anyone who just enjoys the topic, but I do want to question the idea that it’s important to reflect on the potential for nuclear catastrophe. I think nuclear weapons are here whether we like them or not, and that the average person worrying about nuclear war is as unnecessary and self-destructive as worrying about solar flares or plane crashes. Is that incorrect? Is it possible to eradicate all nuclear weapons? Am I capable of influencing whether or not nukes exist? How might one go about disarming powers which do not want to be disarmed? How do we prevent future creation of nuclear bombs or the keeping of existing ones in secret?

    • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      58 minutes ago

      Democracy means you have the illusion of mitigating warmongering, and right to object to your destruction.

  • Dr_Vindaloo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The premise is unrealistic - if there ever was a nuclear war, the first to strike would be the US or Israel, not muh bug bad Norf Kowea.

    • marcie (she/her)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      for real. small country that stays in its small part of the world and doesnt really bother anyone? definitely the first to nuke! definitely not the globe spanning empire that has already used nukes at war.

      • skulblaka@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        and doesnt really bother anyone?

        Don’t they threaten to fire missiles at America like, weekly?

        And try and fail to do it once every six months or so, I feel like I’ve been hearing about failed North Korean missile launches or tests with some regularity since like 2000.

        • Bronstein_Tardigrade@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          When the DPRK test fires missiles, they are naturally launched over the Pacific Ocean. The Lindsey Grahams in Washington clutch their pearls and say “they’re pointed right at us.” Given how Japan has treated Korea over the centuries, Tokyo probably has more to worry about than Honolulu or LA.

          Given what the US did to them during the Korean War, and are still doing to them at the border and economically, I don’t blame David for loading up his sling with a nuclear weapon against an imperialist, war-mongering Goliath. Libya and Iran agreed to give up their nuclear programs and look what the US did to them.

  • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    If my city gets nuked, I hope it goes off right above my head. I don’t want to live through a second that shit.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Doomsday nowadays is an nuclear explosion 200km above a country, back to the 18 Century in milliseconds. Lights off, all electronic devices converted to paperweights, no water, no fuel, no transports, no communication…Mad Max.