• gosling@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t get how people expect services to stay free while also being against any kind of subscription or ads and barely donate to support these projects.

      This isn’t an essential feature they’re paywalling. I don’t even remember the last time I sent a voice note, let alone get one from a stranger. Feels more like a thank you from the devs for supporting them

      • Ser Salty@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also it’s not like voice messages auto play, so this really isn’t a necessary feature

  • PotjiePig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    So we want free apps that offer everything and don’t take your data or advertise. It must also have constant security updates and a fleet of developers keeping it running. Good Luck finding that unicorn.

    I actually like this development. I’d much rather pay for a service with money over my privacy.

      • supermarkus@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Signal literally exists. Free.

        Signal has fewer features than non-premium Telegram. Both are open source, neither can be used with alternative servers (unlike Matrix).

    • waka@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Signal uses donations to keep running. That’s one of the reasons why they don’t need to do this kind of crap. Kinda like Firefox.

      It’s sad to see that slowly but surely the Internet gets divided into the more and more useless giant sector and the free and open sector, which just doesn’t get the attention it needs to be attractive enough for most to switch over. And then there’s also this weird shadow area where I often hear those pirate chanties from…

    • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sounds like the best open source projects out there. How bout we use our tax money to fund great free software for everybody?

    • dinckel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would generally agree with you, if it could allow you to sign-in on multiple devices, and share message history. I understand why it doesn’t do either one, but it does cripple the experience

      • Korne127@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        But… you can’t sign-in on multiple devices and see the message history there?!

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      signal is the perfect messaging app for normies

      But Signal doesn’t let me restrict receiving voice messages either. I only found options regarding calls, not voice messages.

  • neonfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never noticed because I’ve never received a single voice message in the 5+ years of using it. Then again, I only use it with friends and not large communities. I’ve had spam messages, but they’re rare and just text talking about crypto.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Signal is superior in all the important security ways anyway. You’re not losing much except stickies and emotes or whatever.

      • nosnahc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know, I only use Signal ! But tell that to all the others who explain to my why Whatsapp is so much better…

  • soulifix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I keep forgetting why sometimes I even use Telegram. It’s just there. I don’t want their dumb subscription.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well I don’t think you can turn off receiving voice messages in other messengers, either. It’s a weird premium-only feature, but eh, at least they’re not making things worse compared to the baseline.

    • IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can just turn off receiving all messages from any user. This is specifically for people who told their friends that they don’t want to listen to voice messages and want texts, but friends still use voices. Every one I know has a friend like that.

      • reev@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        But even then they have a feature to transcribe them for you. Also Premium though, hehe

  • Kyle@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I definitely prefer premium over my personal data being the product for “free”.

    As I get older I’m appreciating paid electronic services and content when done responsibly in exchange for a private ad-free and well done experience. But it’s taking a lot to get over my decades of conditioning assuming everything on a computer and internet should be “free”.

    I’ve enjoyed my kagi premium search trial and seeing the prices is a bit much. But getting really good search results and having the webpage or search run so fast and seeing my ad blocker greyed out because there were no ads and trackers to block is surreal this day and age.

    I just wish we had a better way of trusting telegram. The only thing encrypted by default is secret chats. I’d buy premium if it made all chats including group chats started by the user encrypted by default.

    • irotsoma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, problem with the fremium model is that they usually still collect and sell information on their premium users just the same as their free users. The premium just add some semi-essential features that they cut out for the free users. And finding truly 100% premium services that don’t sell personal data is rare these days because that’s where the money is for now, information. I don’t mind paying for a good service, but I won’t both pay and share my personal information, that’s just paying twice.

  • mryessir@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Using telegram for years. Its the best messenger.

    Don’t have any troubles. I can use e2e-chats if needed.

    I truely trust them. Besides, their Android client has the best Android source code I have ever seen. Very good resource.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will never understand why people switched from WhatsApp to telegram. Tg is just Russian WhatsApp.

    • ananesiken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Telegram apps are open source, syncs great and accessible from literally everywhere, has great customizability, sends 2 gb files without breaking a sweat, has awesome channels, has bots that is pretty useful… need more reasons?

      • zikk_transport2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Telegram is in every way better. My primary reason for prefering Telegram over anything else are bots (API specifically). I mean bots functionality is so awesome that I can’t properly describe how awesome it is. <3

        • Jannis@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not better in every way. WhatsApp is encrypted by default, Telegram not.

          • moreeni@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why tf is this downvoted if it’s true? Telegram’s own encryption is a joke, you can’t enable it in group chats or through desktop clients. There’s also part fo ToS that states you can’t use your own encryption in Telegram, which is pretty suspicious of a supposed privacy-friendly messenger

        • Pechente@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          People might argue you could just use Discord if you want bots but Discord is so bloated an sluggish in comparison to Telegram’s minimalist native clients for every OS (even Linux).

      • Kekzkrieger@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Telegram by default does not send end-to-end encrypted messages (only in secret chats) and thus can be considered very unsafe as the server owner can literally read all your messages.

        They give the user the impression that they are similar secure to e2e encrypted messengers but really are not since most users just start a normal chat.

        This also means that, in theory, surveillance is very possible and likely as the russians are not really to be trusted by anyone. Privacy nightmare.

        • ananesiken@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Even though not e2e, standard chat messages are still encrypted in their servers. There will always be more private ways to communicate if you are into that about that but for a regular user like myself and many others, Telegram offers much more than you could ask, and is not affiliated with big tech.

        • lattenwald@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          WhatsApp by default backs up to Google drive, which is laughably insecure.

          I don’t know how good is WhatsApp’s e2e implementation, I’ve heard good things about protocol though. But I do know Telegram protocol documentation contains all information needed to implement e2e capable Telegram client, and their e2e is really good, I’ve seen it done by my friend and as I’m a programmer and am interested in cryptography, I followed his work very closely.

          I still do not trust e2e group chats, it’s a shaky point in security protocols. There was some kerfuffle about WhatsApp being able to silently add invisible listeners to group chats, wasn’t there?

          Telegram very explicitly chooses the right amount of security and makes user aware of inconveniences this level of security brings along. WhatsApp lies in user’s face, making you think it’s secure and convenient.

          edit: btw I’m Telegram premium subscriber and love it. I subscribed for the ability to convert voice messages into text. I am aware of privacy concerns, voice messages get sent to some 3rd party for this to work. Pretty often this speech-to-text works not very good, I expect it’s much better for English language though. I still love my Telegram premium, for being able to support developer and to lower the chance of being the product. Cost is negligible, benefits are tangible.

          Every service has a product they sell, if a service is free — you are the product.

          Need I remind you WhatsApp is owned by Meta? Free service from creators of Facebook and our mutual respect to their privacy practices, all in the same sentence, yeah.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Telegram by default does not send end-to-end encrypted messages (only in secret chats)

          When I tap the new message icon in the lower right corner, Telegram asks me which type of message I want to send. There is no default there. Maybe other clients do it differently from the main Android client but here there is no default.

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As I remember it, nobody had cared about Telegram until Signal started gaining some traction as a more private WA alternative. Telegram just rode that wave, plus I suppose it has better support for large groups I guess? The fact that those aren’t even encrypted just gets lost.

    • hardypart@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It has the absolute best and fluid user experience of all messengers I’ve tried so far, especially in conjunction with the desktop client.

      • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Enjoying Matrix, there seems to be an actual focus on privacy. We’re using it for the development comms for Kbin. Feels like an alternative version of discord

      • Pechente@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not. The founder is russian and created vKontakte but basically had it taken away from him by Putin. He’s outspoken against the regime and just because he’s born in Russia shouldn’t mean he should be seen as part of that crappy government.