I mean…you have the container right there on your machine. If you’re concerned, just run your own registry and push copies there when needed. This of course is all unnecessary, as you only need the Dockerfile to build a clean image from scratch, and it will obviously work if it’s already been published.
LOVELY COMMENT.
What are you getting at?
So why don’t we just rename the group to “Puritan Self-Hosting Only”? Where is your line?
Stop giving the purists cred here.
If it works for you, use it. Christ.
Wait…so you’re looking for a solution with zero problems because of…clout or something? I don’t get it.
If you like Debian, just stay with Debian. Especially if you’re not familiar with what running Arch really means in the deeper sense. Mostly that the guardrails are off, in a sense.
CachyOS puts a ton of work into adding UX helpers that makes it pretty user friendly, but it’s still going to have a lot of manual intervention required, but that’s a feature to some.
If you have an AMD laptop, maybe look into installing SteamOS and Kodi as a non-steam app. That could be your sweet spot.
Are you just SAVING as these file extensions, or EXPORTING as each type of file extensions.
Not the difference, and see in the File menu that you need to use the EXPORT function to change actual file type.
The simplest and most pragmatic option.
Yeah…this seems like OP is doing this in extra hard mode, and there are simpler ways to handle the problem.
Unless there is a mapping between a UID of a user across many different machines (something like a domain controller), you’re not going to be able to set proper permissions by user. You need to use a generic group, or provide global read access at a minimum.
I’m not 100% sure why you’ve chosen this route, but there are MUCH simpler ways of doing this that don’t involve VMs and NTFS volumes.
At this point, you’re butting up against 3 levels of nested permissions, including the VM. My suggestion would be to make sure all the files on the NTFS volume have global read access, then go into the VM and attempt to set NTFS permissions on the files (they are different). If that becomes too tedious, you could just try setting 777 on all shared files. It’s unsafe, but may get you through until you find a more…workable solution for what you’re doing here.
I think the overall solution is to just not need this Windows VM, so look at moving these sites off to Nginx or something ASAP.
The closest you’re probably going to get to a half decent looking WYSIWYG editor is something templatized top to bottom. Odoo, Ghost…things like that.
Nothing in particular. They all seem about the same to me. Check top rankings on GitHub perhaps.
It blocks on all the major engines. DDG included.
This will change your life: https://ublacklist.github.io/docs
This one feels more geared for developers, but it works just fine. Used it a couple times: https://github.com/phase1geo/Minder
I’m saying I don’t think there is in this case. I’m not sure what the use case would be simply because you could use any other tools for this specific job.
It’s like asking for an “offline browser” in a sense.
Just use NocoDB or a spreadsheet or something.
Offline first for online content? Whoa buddy, where’s this Moon you’re asking for?
Seriously though, you need to be realistic when you’re asserting your wants for a service or tool. Everyone builds tools to sync bookmarks and save lists now, because that’s a feature that users want. It’s going to be difficult to find something that is “offline”.
Try using a memo app maybe? Lots of password managers have the ability to save links, and would technically be “outside” the browser if you want them to be.
Again, it’s nearly impossible to scrub the entire internet of the code to just run a single command and build a docker image of whatever you were running yourself. If you have the image locally, you can just push it anywhere you want.
Keep Dockerfile, keep checkouts of what you’re running, or push images locally. All very simple.