There’s also third possiblity: US just sell the faulty junk to their vassals for exorbitant prices because US MIC don’t give a flying fuck about wheter US or its vassals win the wars, as long as the junk sells.
There’s also third possiblity: US just sell the faulty junk to their vassals for exorbitant prices because US MIC don’t give a flying fuck about wheter US or its vassals win the wars, as long as the junk sells.
Would be nice if my country instead of being US vassal did have better infrastructure.
“Lets show those dastardly Chinese why we don’t have healthcare. Also the rest of the world that not having healthcare is better than having infrastructure!”
UN when Koreans elected communists: send 2 million grunts
UN when Isn’treal does genocide: send 2 million prayers
Ships visited Cuba included frigate Admiral Gorshkov and nuclear submarine Kazan, both from Nothern Fleet, and those in this article are unspecified but most likely from the Pacific Fleet.
To be fair, American school shooters do not use 500kg aerial bombs (yet)
Oh lol hahahaha
Obligatory (Fun fact, dude is currently Foreign Minister of Poland, and not for the first time either, and have closest ties, both personal and professional to Washington establishment out of every Polish politicians)
Why, are you so shocked someone might not be fond of your piece of hitlerite theory?
Try to be less condescending asshole next time, and as well less imperialist bootlicker, i of course do know this term exist, but it’s as nonsensical made up imperialist shit as the borders in Africa, of which sole reason for existing is to frame imperialist interests of, let’s see… a fucking “interwar” Germany, imperial Japan and USA, what a chummy company indeed. Your link even says it completely straight lmao:
Scholarship has shown that the “Indo-Pacific” concept circulated in Weimar Germany, and spread to interwar Japan. German political oceanographers envisioned an “Indo-Pacific” comprising anticolonial India and republican China, as German allies, against “Euro-America”.[4] Since the late 2010s, the term “Indo-Pacific” has been increasingly used in geopolitical discourse. It has a “symbiotic link” with the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue, or “Quad”, an informal grouping between Australia, Japan, India, and the United States. It has been argued that the concept may lead to a change in popular “mental maps” of how the world is understood in strategic terms.[5] According to the political scientist Amitav Acharya, the “Indo-Pacific” was a concept built by strategists.[6] The Indo-Pacific started to gain ground in international relations literature as a geopolitical challenge by the U.S. toward China.[7]
Oh and also look at the guy who coined the term:
Karl Ernst Haushofer (27 August 1869 – 10 March 1946) was a German general, professor, geographer, and diplomat. Haushofer’s concept of Geopolitik influenced the ideological development of Adolf Hitler. Rudolf Hess was also a student of Haushofer, and during Hess and Hitler’s incarceration by the Weimar Republic after the Beer Hall Putsch, Haushofer visited Landsberg Prison to teach and mentor both Hess and Hitler. Haushofer also coined the political use of the term Lebensraum, which Hitler also used to justify both crimes against peace and genocide.
You can’t make this shit up
Last when i check India has an ocean named for it and it ain’t Pacific, to which India isn’t even close. What the hell is this geography failure. But i guess after inviting landlocked countries in middle of Europe to the North Atlantic treaty…
America never cares when its people are killed in other countries except when it’s useful to its politics. Read about sinking of Athenia - even fucking Goebbels of all people believed US propaganda entirely. And also of course about USS Liberty incident.
Actually Existing Libertarianism
Australia refused this time? Can’t blame them after what happened before.
Western freeze peach reality is even more ridiculous than the accusations they throw at the countries the don’t like
Why the hell would a country do something for no reason
This is kinda astounding posting and i read it all the time everywhere. On one side we have western imperialists shamelessly and openly looting Africa for centuries, but liberals will suddenly expect China to just do one sided transactions that only cause them loss? And make it the implicit or explicit “both sides bad” argument? It’s also usually from the proponents of capitalism and free trade, which is in theory supposed to benefit both sides.
Depends who and in what situation. USA or Israel do it more than not. This case? I don’t see why, especially that it’s in accordance with other countries, as quoted by few other posters in this thread.
They don’t sell only faulty junk, they sell everything they can sell, and also there is a difference between still useful important vassal like Israel and 3rd rate dump like Poland that only ever managed to say “no” to USA twice and one of this times was because antisemitism.