Idk about as powerful as gpt 4, but openrouter.ai has a ton of open source models you can use, including gpt 4.
Informal Logic—A Pragmatic Approach:
The fault of blind dogmatism, of only seeing one side of the argument as a position worth investigating, is among the most severe impediments or handicaps in reasonable dialogue.
Idk about as powerful as gpt 4, but openrouter.ai has a ton of open source models you can use, including gpt 4.
Use your preferred AI to write the letter for you!
Putting up those dishes is going to be exhausting!
Or am I?
My wife does this, and I’m just like, “…wtf is your problem?”
I think, like Obsidian, it stores them as markdown files.
Then Logseq. It’s an outliner (each line can be it’s own…thing…), but it’s open source and a direct competitor of Obsidian. In fact, I was ambivalent between the two when I first started with online note-taking.
Give it a few years, we’ll understand real authoritarianism soon enough as Americans.
Why bother?
Uh…because war is horrible?
That’s not a reason to get lax, but to remain vigilant while moving towards greater collaboration.
Among respondents who own luxury brands that they themselves bought (e.g., Gucci, Versace, Rolex), 44% prefer to live in a world without any of those brands altogether. Among respondents not owning such brands, the fraction preferring to live in a world without them is 69%.
That’s interesting.
Actually, this is kinda like using fossil fuels. If we didn’t have fossil fuels our lives would be miserable. And while using them adds some utility, burning fossil fuels still leaves us miserable, particularly as climate change grows worse.And so, even though I use fossil fuels to fuel my car, heat my home, and cook my food, I’d still prefer to live in a world where its significantly reduced to phased out altogether.
NYT and WSJ reported this moments ago.
For trivial bullshit like the state of the American economy, these two publications are alright. For real bullshit like foreign policy, you’d be a fool to believe them after the weapons of mass destruction lie.
What we know is that a hospital was struck in Gaza and a bunch of people were killed (what a fucking stupid sentence…like…who the fuck strikes a hospital?!) That’s it.
Now that is a good argument!
They are just screaming they want to be logical/rational in an unlogical/irrational world.
Well, god damn, if that doesn’t hurt.
Oh. If they answer they think a Republican will do better on the economy, then I’ll proceed to show how Republicans are the most financially irresponsible of the two parties.
Okay, who here honestly thinks a Republican president is going to do better on the economy?
Please let me prove you wrong by answering in the affirmative.
Claude.ai. I took the transcript of the video and asked for an outline using a prompt I usually use for outlining textbook chapters lol.
Here’s an AI outline because this was actually a good talk:
How Platforms Die
Facebook Case Study
Causes of Enshittification
Solutions
Conclusion
Definitely satire lol
Oh great. I’ll get live updates from the Heritage Foundation and the Daily Signal about how Biden’s anarchistic will is being carried out through Fani Willis in an egregious abuse of the law to prosecute the greatest political force for good the world has ever seen since Chile’s Pinochet.
I can’t wait!
Are we energy independent enough for Republicans yet? Or is Biden still knee-capping our national security by producing too little?
Ha! You’re right. I didn’t mean it was open source. I did mean that it was available.