• primehunter326@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Nothing the US says about the war should be taken at face value, but this is just someone speculating on a blog. And since this is the second time I’ve seen theory conspiracy today I’m going to guess it’s whats circulating online. Is it possible? Sure. “Hundreds” of special operations (as reported in actual media outlets) is a lot to send after one guy, and the mission profile is similar to what’s been described would be needed to retrieve nuclear material. But…it’s still just speculation without any new info to back it up.

    At least this guy kind of acknowledges that the Iranians shouldn’t be taken at their word either. Too many terminally online folks with an anti-US/anti-west boner take anything that aligns with their bias without question.

    • Goun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You don’t know what a conspiracy actually is, don’t you?

    • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      This “argument” of yours is what imperialist apologizers like you use to try to invalidate people when they’re talking about an obvious CIA op simply because media isn’t covering because they’re obviously bought and this is classified information. We can theorize all we want given the current data you know? If you want to call it a conspiracy until some Western mouth piece tells you it’s true go ahead.

      • orc girly@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 hours ago

        No no no we have a boner for this and we’re wrong, we’ve been beaten fair and square /j