ColdWater@lemmy.ca to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-219 hours agoWhat have I done?lemmy.caimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1148arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1147arrow-down1imageWhat have I done?lemmy.caColdWater@lemmy.ca to Linux@lemmy.ml · edit-219 hours agomessage-square49fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCoki91@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·8 hours agoYeah it is but systemd is a suite of apps (see, a collective) and elogind is a standalone, the claim is still true
minus-squarefurry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 hours agoi could be wrong here but didnt elogind need to be patched to work with other inits?
minus-squarejuipeltje@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 hours agoI don’t think elogind hooks into other inits directly, but it it is a fork of the logind part of systemd that has been altered so that it can work without systemd, if that’s what you mean.
Yeah it is but systemd is a suite of apps (see, a collective) and elogind is a standalone, the claim is still true
i could be wrong here but didnt elogind need to be patched to work with other inits?
I don’t think elogind hooks into other inits directly, but it it is a fork of the logind part of systemd that has been altered so that it can work without systemd, if that’s what you mean.