• emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    But in 10-15 years nobody will let the Strait of Hormuz get blocked like this again.

    How??? You have giant, slow, unarmed ships filled with flammable liquid that are forced to go through a small channel. Forget missiles and drones; you could set them on fire with artillery.

    More likely, in 10-15 years we will have moved away from fossil fuels to the point that a closure will no longer crash the world economy.

    • youcantreadthis@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You could set them on fire with shit i can buy at home depot and an inflatable kayak.

      In an area as constrained as the straits, im not entirely sure you’d need the kayak.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      a closure will no longer crash the world economy

      I don’t think we will reach that point in a meaningful timeframe.

      My understanding of the global oil market is rudimentary but… even if we were only using half the oil we presently are when the strait was shut down, the same portion would likely be coming from there, so the “shock” would still be the same because increasing production elsewhere to increase supply is non-trivial.

      That said, if a big chunk of transportation infrastructure has been “decarbonised” then sure, fuel costs might increase while transport costs are less effected.