• deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Oh hi it’s me. Archwiki and tldr are great, but man pages explain things adequately about 20% of the time.

      Many of the Ms we’re supposed to R aren’t very well written, and we need to be open to explaining how things work in different ways if qe want others to take up with the things we like.

      • Redkey@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Man pages are the only reference material I know that has more information-free circular definition chains than Wikipedia. And I imagine that it’s for much the same reason; they’re primarily written and fought over by experts who only need terse reminder notes for themselves, and who can’t remember what it was like not spending every day up to their elbows in the subject.

      • 3abas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        And Google sucks more and more every day…

        There’s a good way to point people to existing documentation without being a jackass.

        If someone doesn’t find the wiki article that answers their question because they didn’t know how to ask it with the right keywords, just point them to the wiki article and add any missing context to help the next person out.

        A rude “rtfm” response with closing the ticket isn’t helpful.

        • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          it’s expected to tell someone to rtfm politely, but it exists for a reason and we must cultivate a culture of rtfm. the community can be there for more specific advice.