Logos of Aether: A Measurement-Theoretic Physics Engine in Rust/WGPU (v2.2.1)

I’ve been “winging it” for a year trying to formalize a theory that has been bouncing around my head since high school. After years of post-graduation struggle and feeling like I was failing at life, I finally funneled that obsession into 566 pages of theory and a working simulation engine. This is Logos-Core.

The goal: To prove the universe doesn’t compute with Zero or Infinity, but with Ratios in a resource-constrained substrate called the Monadic Plenum.

🛠 The Stack

  • Language: Rust (strictly leveraging zero-cost abstractions for the PlenumReal type).
  • Compute: WGPU / WGSL (the universe as a GL_RGBA32F state matrix).
  • Architecture: Ping-Pong Buffer Causality (strict temporal separation between frames).

The Core Axiom: $\pi$-Saturation

Standard physics breaks at high densities because linear addition ($1+1=2$) leads to singularities. My engine implements Plenum Addition ($\oplus$). Just as $c$ is the speed limit, $\pi$ is the saturation limit for information density.

$$x \oplus y = \frac{x + y}{1 + \frac{xy}{\pi^2}}$$

In v2.2.1, I’ve verified this on-hardware. While small increments appear linear, self-addition ($x \oplus x$) demonstrates a hard saturation at $\pi$, rendering singularities mathematically impossible at the architectural level.

The Teeter-Totter (Causal Budgeting)

We replace “Uncertainty” with Resource Constraints. The engine enforces a zero-sum trade-off between Temporal Resolution ($d_{self}$) and Spatial Resolution ($d_{world}$):

$$d_{self} \cdot d_{world} \le \pi c$$

If a Monad (pixel) requires high spatial precision, its internal update frequency (Time) must drop. In this architecture, Inertia is literally processing latency.

v2.2.1 “Soliton” Features:

  • Self-Propagating Solitons: High-pressure waves that wrap and interfere without dissipation.
  • The Chronoscope: A real-time GPU visualizer (cargo run --example chronoscope) for observing Aether ripple in a ping-pong buffer.
  • Singularity Prevention: No renormalization required; the math is self-braking.

Strategic Commons Licensing

This project is built to be a common possession of humanity.

  • Code (AGPL-3.0): Open source.
  • Theory (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0): The 573-page manuscript.
  • Math (Public Domain): Truth cannot be enclosed.

Repo: https://github.com/chrisnchips42-blip/logos-core

I’ve spent a long time fucking around in life, doing shit like trying to die and wasting a marriage. But this has bounced around my head 15 years and I think what I have is solid. I’m looking for feedback on the WGSL compute kernels and the Plenum_pingpong implementation. If the universe is a computation, it has a hardware limit—this is my attempt to map it.

  • chrisnchips@programming.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m gonna say maybe I suck at seeking feedback. Pardon me for trying to present my “theory” I’ve held for 15 years with a decent presentation. But fuck you all for responding to psychotic symptoms with gaslighting. Fucking wow. I work with my psych and am an adult. Thanks for the “concern”. Bunch of fucking nihilists, all of you. Think there’s some vacuum out there to dump your anger into, but here I am taking on your self-hatred as usual. Mind your tone bitch.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I’m glad to hear you’re getting help! Hope you pull through this. I think myself and others are really wishing the best for you, please don’t be offended.

      As for your physics theory & code though, I must repeat what others are saying. Stop using LLMs (be it copilot or gemini), they are clouding your thoughts and blurring any original ideas you may have into an incoherent sloppy mess.

      Scrap your repo, clear your mind, start over. Don’t have many expectations, most (I’d guess 99%) of amateur physics theories out there turn out to be wrong.

      Open a markdown document in a simple editor and write down your ideas, by yourself, with no stupid computer program telling you what to think.

      Then take a pen and paper and try to distill your ideas into mathematical formulae, with no stupid computer program (which doesn’t have any real mathematical knowledge or rigor) making up bogus equations.

      Then, using that same pen and paper, try to work through a few examples of applying those formulae to specific physical situations. Start simple, don’t try to reproduce the entire universe at all scales at once, maybe start with a finite universe containing a couple of electrons and see how their interactions play out. Don’t let a stupid computer program (which can’t even perform basic arithmetic by itself) make grave mistakes.

      If it seems like the model works for a couple very simple examples, try to put it into code. Don’t use Rust or GPUs or even scipy for your first prototype, just write it in pure python. And for the love of all that is good, don’t use LLMs for this either. Just take your formulae from your piece of paper and translate it into python by hand, with no stupid computer program (which can’t even count the number of R’s in a word strawberry) stealing code from others and writing boilerplate instead of describing your original ideas.

      Don’t worry about performance for a prototype, if the results it produces are at least interesting, you can worry about optimizations later.

    • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This video is silly but does a good job of conveying how dumb chatbots can actually be especially if you think you’re onto something. Even though your idea makes sense (I don’t know enough about physics to say either way), keep in mind this is the thing that you’re sharing it with. If it’s dumb when asked a dumb question it’s not a good sign for how smart it will be when asked a smart question.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRjgNgJms3Q

      Edit: just remembered about this person recently brought up on a discord server I’m on who was clearly having some chatbot break down over physics in a weird way https://github.com/aaronschutza/Research

      This one is particularly obviously nonsensical https://github.com/aaronschutza/Research/blob/main/APH_Quake.pdf

      Anyways the point is that AI is absolutely not trustworthy in any way