The average American now holds onto their smartphone for 29 months, according to a recent survey by Reviews.org, and that cycle is getting longer. The average was around 22 months in 2016.

While squeezing as much life out of your device as possible may save money in the short run, especially amid widespread fears about the strength of the consumer and job market, it might cost the economy in the long run, especially when device hoarding occurs at the level of corporations.

  • gerryflap@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The person who wrote this must be absolutely insane. How I’d it a bad thing for the world that people are holding on to their devices? Less e-waste and people don’t spend impulsively. It’s also very logical: smartphones reached a plateau and people aren’t exactly swimming in money with the rising price of everything.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      The person is writing from a business prospective. If people are replacing their phones less often, it means that fewer phones are being purchased each year. If your company makes phones, that means adjusting to a shrinking market no matter what your company does.

  • its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I am not an economist. I am not an expert on anything consumer. It is, however, plainly obvious that companies are trying to squeeze blood from a stone at this point. They can’t make money anymore with pay to own and innovation like they used to for a variety of reasons. From greed to enshitification. If you look at it with a different view, everyone is poorer because they are greedy, they’ve ruined everyone’s lives but must make numbers go up. So they find new and terrifying ways of screwing you over for diminishing returns. Like this. Relying on turnover sales and nothing else.

    • Insekticus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      From greed to enshitification. If you look at it with a different view, everyone is poorer because they are greedy, they’ve ruined everyone’s lives but must make numbers go up…

      This is the leading concept behind Capitalism. It’s a self-devouring system. Every. Single. Time.

      • its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah. I’d even say we went beyond late stage capitalism. We are now on the cusp of a feudalistic society more akin to the corporate dominance in Blade Runner or Eve Online, maybe The Expanse, then anything resembling capitalism. Corporations are more powerful than nation states, many people are indentured to their workplace via healthcare needs or non competes, etc. So there’s that. This is an entirely new thread though so I’ll stop it there. TL;DR - This shit sucks.

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    29 months is too long??? I consider that the absolute minimum.

    If my device doesn’t last at least 36 months I look for a new company. I aim for at least 48 months.

    I refuse to buy Samsung or Google devices anymore, since they definitely did not meet my 36 month criteria. They didn’t even make it to 24. Google did at first with my Nexus 4 and I loved it but they shit the bed real quick after that.

    • its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I bought an older Samsung and only use it for doom scrolling, 2FA, and podcasts. Its fine stripped down to nothingness. My next purchase, once the cracks from me dropping it spread, will be an older Pixel so I can run GraphineOS. I’m hopeful that like my Linux experience, it’ll extend the devices life given my use case. Like buying old laptops and kicking windows to the curb in favor of Linux buys you tons of time and product life.

  • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    13 hours ago

    While it may seem to be a smart money move, it can result in a costly productivity and innovation lag for the economy.

    For the love of god! Won’t somebody think of the economy?!

  • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Oh look, it’s the consumers who threaten the economy, not the fucking ghouls in the C suite, killing jobs and cutting wages. How dare they not having enough money? How DARE they?

    • runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      My wife finally upgraded after 5 years, and I’m on year 4 of my Pixel 6 and its still going strong, will probably go another 1-2 years with it.

  • Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Why would that hurt the economy? If you want people to spend money, make things affordable and useful. They make things shittier and more expensive and then wonder why people aren’t buying

  • thesmokingman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The big given example was gigabit throughput. Most consumers in the US, businesses included, don’t have access to internet infrastructure capable of multigig because of regulatory capture. Those that do are already using multigig hardware which, unsurprisingly, hasn’t really changed much.