Ok, so of the 7 Billion hike (of the total 64B he aims at!), what is the business case?
Has anyone seen it? Is it 3B for troops and 1B for French made equipment and 3B on American made? Or 6B on American equipment and 1B on troop readiness? What percentage is for contingency? (American made stuff, very easily and practically instantly Trump can make them grounded), is the 7B hike for France defense, or to buy American to directly ship to Ukraine? That, and many others, are question you will never see the media ask, and until there is an answer and accountability, it is just money laundering … pretty much just like shipping airplanes full of sacks of money to Baghdad and expecting desirable outcomes.
Correct me if I’m wrong but couldn’t the EU part of NATO have halted Russia’s “special military operation” in the very beginning, if they had actually decided to go in Ukraine? I seem to recall they didn’t want to go in because of various reasons, but I don’t think lack of military capability was one of them. Instead they decided to trickle in weapons as to “not be involved.” Did anything of significance change so that Europe is suddenly super weak militarily against Russia? I guess Europe is weak against the US, but that’s not quite the framing used.
To be free in this world we must be feared. To be feared we must be powerful.
Hmmm… 🤔
To be powerful, we must have better weapons, lots of them.
That’s the vibe coming from most nations around the globe.
The weapon industry couldn’t be happier.
To be powerful, we must have better weapons
The only fucking country France has had a problem with for the past century was a hypermilitarized Germany. Maybe keep your priorities straight and a boot on the heads of the perfidious deutsch
Petit Jupiter strikes again.
The Western European ethos stays strong!
