Cult I Mean Group
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 7 months ago

Russia Has 'Every Right' to Attack NATO Targets Now: Retired US Colonel

www.newsweek.com

external-link
message-square
56
fedilink
40
external-link

Russia Has 'Every Right' to Attack NATO Targets Now: Retired US Colonel

www.newsweek.com

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.mlEnglish · 7 months ago
message-square
56
fedilink
Russia has "every right" to attack NATO targets now: Retired US Colonel
www.newsweek.com
external-link
Lawrence Wilkerson commented on President Joe Biden's authorization for Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range weapons on Russia.
  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    And once Russia hits a NATO country trolls like you will start crying how Russia started a completely unprovoked war against a peaceful defensive alliance.

    • erin@social.sidh.bzh
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      7 months ago

      I will not cry because when it will happen, their are only 2 outcomes:

      • Russia is demilitarize so fast by NATO countries that the country will not be able to do much (that outcome has even been told by Putin himself in 2023 as the reason Russia has no chance against NATO)
      • Both countries use their nuke and we will be all dead in a beautiful bang :)

      in both outcome Russia loose

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 months ago

        The actual outcome is going to be that the US will leave Europe to hang, and NATO will collapse. The fact that you don’t get that is absolutely hilarious. If you think that the Oligarchs in US are going to risk a nuclear war with Russia over Europe you should really get your head checked.

        • erin@social.sidh.bzh
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          you forget that France and UK both have Nuke too… For France 1 launch from a submarine lead to 160 nuke warhead on Russia in case of war…

          • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            7 months ago

            What France and UK don’t have is a delivery system that Russia has. Meanwhile, if France or UK tried to lob a nuke at Russia then they’d simply cease to exist within 20 minutes.

            • erin@social.sidh.bzh
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              7 months ago

              delivery system? France can send Nuke from ICBM, submarine (from all over the world) and Rafale (which can take off from French aircraft carrier which also mean nuke can be send from all over the world…). De Gaulle built the France defense without US because he though that the next French war would be against US not Russia and all president after him kept that strategic independence from US for the same reason… Russia-French friendship and French distrust in US was still strong until Russia invaded Crimea leading to the cancellation of Mistral ships and the beginning of tension between both countries.

              So Yes, if a Nuclear War start between Russia and France, as a said, both countries would be vitrified and we will be all dead…

              • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                7 months ago

                A delivery system that cannot be intercepted. ICBMs are old tech, and Russia has repeatedly demonstrated the ability to intercept missiles. France or UK simply lack the arsenal wipe out all of Russia, while Russia very much could complete wipe out either country in case of a nuclear war.

                However, my original point was that Russia can use a non nuclear Oreshnik system to hit UK or France, and if the US fails to intervene then it will be the end of NATO. It’s that simple.

                • erin@social.sidh.bzh
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  you know that EU has an equivalent of NATO article 5:

                  https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/sede/dv/sede200612mutualdefsolidarityclauses_/sede200612mutualdefsolidarityclauses_en.pdf

                  and which countries are about to join EU? Ukraine and Moldova. So even without US, nuke have a good chance to rain all over the old continent…

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    12
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    You know that EU has no actual military to speak of?

                    Russia outproduces all of the west militarily, and EU is only a small fraction of NATO spending https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/10/politics/russia-artillery-shell-production-us-europe-ukraine/index.html

                    Here’s what FT had to say about the UK military:

                    Starmer has commissioned a strategic defence review, calling in a host of experts led by Lord George Robertson, the former Nato secretary-general. It’s a necessary start, but an inadequate one. The hallowed tradition of such reviews is that they pretend to reconcile grandiose ambitions with economic austerity. The result is that Britain has a Potemkin village military retaining the emblems of a pocket superpower, but without the necessary hard capabilities. The present disordered world does not leave room for such tricks.

                    Similarly, no part of German military is ready for war https://brusselssignal.eu/2024/03/no-part-of-german-military-ready-for-war-armed-forces-official-warns/

                    Europe is absolutely nothing without the US. It’s just a bunch of chihuahuas yapping.

                    Also, It’s funny that you should mention Ukraine since it is the biggest and most experienced army in Europe right now. This army is now collapsing trying to fight Russia according to BBC.

      • REEEEvolution@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Everyone dying is hardly a loss for just Russia, mankind as a whole would lose because it would no longer exist.

World News@lemmy.ml

worldnews@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !worldnews@lemmy.ml

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 693 users / day
  • 2.15K users / week
  • 5.56K users / month
  • 13.5K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 36.7K subscribers
  • 14.6K Posts
  • 131K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Rumblestiltskin@lemmy.ml
  • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
  • Jack.@lemmy.ml
  • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org