• sunbeam60@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ask yourself what the alternative is and what a successful outcome for Russia will enable for Putin! Then ask yourself what that means for Europe. Finally ask yourself what upheaval of a European market will do to an American economy and America’s ability to make its influence felt across the world.

    Helping Ukraine is far cheaper.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Did North Vietnam win over the USA? There’s a good communist counter-example for my hexbear comrades!

        And also, whether Ukraine can win (probably not) is less consequential to Europe than it is to Ukraine. But the cost of Russia’s assumed victory is helping to determine whether Russia wants to try again, against another country.

    • MultigrainCerealista [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I see a lot of geopolitical calculus in your response - to what extent is the influence of the US over Europe and European markets limited by a Russian victory. You present something of a US-centric point of view but sure it’s a valid one. If Russia wins then yes likely the geopolitical influence of the USA will be knocked back to where it was in the 1980s with true multipolar politics, and it’s also true that if Europe wasn’t sanctioning Russian energy then they’d likely be buying that much cheaper energy, thereby reducing the geopolitical influence of the USA over Europe.

      So I think I agree with most of what you say. But your perspective leaves something very important out of the equation:

      Where does the will of the people who live in Donbas and Lubansk and Crimea factor into your math? Do we respect their right to self-determination? If not, why not?

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well my answer was in reference to why it was in the US’ interest to pump money into Ukraine so it will invariably be US centric. I’m not American by the way.

        The right of self-determination is important but it is not sacrosanct and unassailable. Catalonia, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Quebec, Åland, Greenland - there are many areas around the world, where there is disagreement about where a region should belong. These are hard problems to solve, in some cases there’s been votes, in some places violent, minority resistance movements have arisen.

        In no case has a region unilaterally declared independence and been invaded by a large neighbour. This just isn’t how we should play.

        So if you’re hoping to use “the right to self-determination” as a justification for Russia’s actions, then I definitely reject that argument.

    • mihor@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can finance this slaughter yourself, thank you very much.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know which country you think I’m from, but all the countries I have a citizenship in are financing Ukraine plenty.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can finance this slaughter right now, or you can finance your own slaughter later.

        Your choice.