I’d like to settle on a distro, but none of them seem to click for me. I want stability more than anything, but I also value having the latest updates (I know, kind of incompatible).

I have tested Pop!_Os, Arch Linux, Fedora, Mint and Ubuntu. Arch and Pop being the two that I enjoyed the most and seemed the most stable all along… I am somewhat interested in testing NixOS although the learning curve seems a bit steep and it’s holding me back a bit.

What are you using as your daily drive? Would you recommend it to another user? Why? Why not?

  • Lemmchen@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    For the past six years it has been Kubuntu, but I think it’s time to finally abort Canonical and their idiosyncrasies and choose Debian as a KDE base, especially now that Debian 12 includes non-free firmware by default.

    • di5ciple@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      This man knows. My whole config is stored in github. Super easy to come back to a perfectly setup box or clone it on another machine.

  • shrugal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Fedora! To me it sits right at the sweet spot of stability and bleeding edge (they call it “leading edge”), and I’m very happy with how they run things (including the most recent controversy!).

  • TCB13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Debian – The Universal Operating System

    Because it’s universal, runs on everything rock solid and stable.

  • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Debian stable, the os for 50 year old nudists.

    It’s the stable branch of one of the oldest distributions around.

  • booklovero@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fedora.

    I can highly recommend fedora to a newbie. It’s easier to use than ubuntu. It doesn’t come with snaps. You only need one or two methods of installing apps. It’s safe. It’s well written. It’s supported very well. It’s updated frequently. It incorporates innovative technology.

    Opensuse and EndeaverOS are also very nice.

  • HegemonSushi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve always felt that Arch has the least amount of personal compromises. For “bleeding edge,” it’s also generally stable and has a wealth of community support and documentation.

  • kanzalibrary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Unpopular opinion: Antix Linux for workstation, because:

    1. It’s Debian
    2. Very lightweight (100mb on RAM)
    3. Live to RAM
    4. Frugal installation
    5. Small size ISO (1gb) with full function utility
    6. Flexibel recovery, from old to modern system
    7. Responsive (no systemd)
    8. Retro-kind WM (icebox-wm), perfectly match on retro system
    • meurglys@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’ve long enjoyed using antiX. Their forum is very friendly and useful. Highly recommend!