

and it seems to be not true at all that “California just killed” anything, so far the bill has only been introduced, not passed as the title implies


and it seems to be not true at all that “California just killed” anything, so far the bill has only been introduced, not passed as the title implies


current GPL licenses doesn’t protect them from A.I. scrapping their work
The legal status of AI scraping is not dependent on a specific license.
It’s dependent on whether copyright law requires permission from a copyright holder to train AI on their work. This is, as far as I know, not (mostly) a legally settled question yet.
All a license can do is permit things that would otherwise not be permitted. If copyright law doesn’t require that kind of permission, then it doesn’t matter what the author wrote in the license, they won’t be able to successfully sue for copyright infringement.
Meanwhile, if copyright law does require permission from copyright holders for training AI on their works, then the GPL already does what you want to achieve, because then anything generated from such an AI is already a derivative work.


sad John Perry Barlow noises
Similar thoughts here: https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/10/30/new-atheism-the-godlessness-that-failed/
Particularly interesting is this comment:
One really interesting addition to me is that the early internet was a very, VERY free speech place. It loved Gish Gallops of enormous numbers of arguments from all sides and the idea that you would tell anyone, even the most foolish, that they should be banned was verboten.
In fact, early atheists loved creationists posting! It gave them content because these people were so obviously wrong. And creationists the same, because it allowed them to fight back too.
The modern deplatforming support on both sides is another sign that that era is gone.


Among techy people.
Among ordinary users, I don’t think so.


ctrl+f for “calculator”, though it doesn’t really use the (detailed) wording from the OP, which I think they copied from this list of links without attribution :P


EA, not FIFA. The games are nowadays not even called FIFA anymore.


Check out this: https://exiftool.org/#filename
That can move photos into directories according to their EXIF date, which should already help you a lot.


As an Esperantist I like the fact that so many FOSS projects have Esperanto-derived names. 👍


I’ve never used the terminal on Android for anything serious. I’ve used it, but only for really nerdy things most users will never need.


KolourPaint is very close to an exact clone of MS Paint from around Windows XP.
There are also xpaint and Pinta, which are somewhat different, but might satisfy your requirements too.


The new platform, W, will require identification and photo validation to ensure that its users are both humans and who they claim to be
apparently we are now supposed to think that that is a good thing, huh


This is probably supposed to be a link to this: https://torrentfreak.com/nvidia-contacted-annas-archive-to-secure-access-to-millions-of-pirated-books/
There are a few communities where that link was posted correctly: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/53133358


That’s not what I asked. I asked about a comparison of both of them to PostgreSQL.


Are there real advantages to using either MySQL or MariaDB instead of PostgreSQL?


something something two things are infinite something something universe and human stupidity something something not sure about universe


I use it all the time in web browsers (Firefox/LibreWolf can do it even on Linux). I learned to use computers on Windows (mainly XP), so as far as I’m concerned, that has “always” been a thing, so why would I not use it.


Former Windows users who expect that to start scrolling. I remember that happening to me when I was new to Linux.
I agree with that of course.