I’d love to know what “recently linked to a firearms incident” actually means, especially given that it seems to have been flagged by an automated system and that “firearms incident” was seen as justification to ram a car off the road and then shoot the occupant in the back before any actual threat was verified.
It’s only a stupid judicial precedent if you assume the police are there to enforce the law and help people.
Okay but no one says “shot dead black man”. It would be “shot black man dead”.
What good does this really do south africa though? Id more expect his loyalty to be to himself and his own profit than any country regardless of where he’s native.
The article, where they say the cops rammed him off the road, that he was shot in the back of the head and that the subsequent investigation found no weapons