I’ve come to the conclusion, people who use vim just continue to do so out of a stubborn sense of pride for finally learning the key combinations.

folks that have been doing this exclusively for 30 years

And yet the number of people I hear “just switch to Linux!” When the other person has been using Windows for 30 years blows my mind.

Inertia is a hell of a drug.

How many tiles do you get? I thought it was 8

I’ve done a 1PB sync between a pair of 8-node SAN clusters as one was being physically moved since it’d be faster to seed the data and start a delta sync rather than try to do it all over a 10Gb pipe. M

I had to block /politics and /world news for that exact reason. It was just going way far off the rails for what I was looking for in Lemmy.

It’s been forever since I’ve been to 4chan… I’m almost afraid to check out /b/

Close… the way it was phrased it basically becomes up to the Supreme Court to decide what’s “official”

Look up Anycast when you get a chance.

I really hope you meant “switch” when saying “hub”. I haven’t seen a hub used in decades. Also your switch should have some level of STP protection enabled to prevent that. Even if someone had a hub with a routing loop, STP would have disabled the ports.

W4MM

Thank you for qualifying that. I hate when people immediately go “.255 isn’t a valid address!” It, and .0 very much are if you’re using a /23 or larger.

Potential double (triple) nat issue? Do any other streaming services work?

The bigger trouble is creating a CDN has a stupidly high barrier to entry. You literally need your own data centers across the world, your own server infrastructure, the man power to manage it, etc.

You could try to host it on a cloud provider but you’d go bankrupt even quicker. Unless someone were to try to build a co-op run CDN, it’s just not gonna happen without a profit motive and a large amount of capital.

Just note, OP, that the last part of his statement is pure speculation. The first part is technically true, which can lead to that inference, but no information has been released which corroborates it. However, that does not mean it’s not possible.

Maximum Landing Weight and Maximum Takeoff Weight. Because of the stress put on the airframe when landing you don’t want a heavy plane. It’s easier to control when taking off because it’s smoother. So having the same weight on landing means the airframe will need to be beefed up, or you fly with less overall since more goes to the plane.

Posted this in another chat…

I’ve always been curious how electric planes will address MLW as they scale up. Even if you get similar energy densities and can cover MTOW, you generally count on reducing weight as you use up fuel and are lighter when you land. But with a battery your weight is going to be roughly the same. Will that mean you have to take into account the increased weight and will have less room for cargo/passengers?

VMware went with Purple for their hypervisors so you get a PSOD instead. Always was fun when you’d hit the console for a server and get greeted by that instead of the yellow and black split screen.

Cool cool. Remove oil and gas subsidies and let’s see how much the true TCO is for owners (not manufacturers)

There may be some confusion in there. I haven’t noticed a difference between 5 and 7, mainly because my devices haven’t supported it yet but more so my primary systems are wired. That being said I can get solid enough transfer for streaming on 5 so it’s more of you have large file transfers or a shit load of people sound you.

The other part of your statement, most people who have an AP won’t be running the WiFi on their router. Hell my router doesn’t even have a wireless antenna. So the only thing acting as a base station is my AP.

I have a WiFi 7 AP but yet to see any devices in out there really. My only device that supports 6E is my iPhone, but I generally go wired and haven’t noticed the performance increase.