• 0 Posts
  • 330 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 7th, 2023

help-circle



  • lud@lemm.eetoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldPaid SSL vs Letsencrypt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Yeah, absolutely!

    I actually like the change.

    It’s just that it will create a lot of work for us (especially for me and my colleague) short term. I would very much appreciate it if Google actually bothered to give an exact timeline (optimally a few months or a year in advance).


  • lud@lemm.eetoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldPaid SSL vs Letsencrypt
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    PSA: All public certificates (private internal certificates won’t be affected) will have a lifetime of only 90 days soon. Google is planning to reduce their lifetime in 2024 but considering that they haven’t given an update on this since early this year, I doubt it will happen this year.

    But it will happen soon.

    This will be a pain in the ass for my workplace because we primarily use Digicert and manually renewing certificates every 90 days is just impossible for use. We are currently looking into a way to switch to letsencrypt or similar.







  • Yes, but how is it malicious to comply with the license? If the license doesn’t require the code to be usable without a backend they have fully complied. Does the license even require usable code at all?

    As long as they give the source code they are required to give I don’t see any problem with it.




  • lud@lemm.eetoLinux@lemmy.mlMan pages maintenance suspended
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    some companies will get creative with it and make their source available but in a way that is useless without the backend. And even if they don’t maliciously comply with the license, they can still charge for their services.

    What is wrong with charging for your services?

    Open source licences aren’t meant to make it impossible to earn money or anything. As long as companies comply with the licences I don’t see anything wrong with it.

    If a licence wants to make it impossible to earn money they should put that in the actual licence.





  • My work use it in a limited capacity.

    We primarily use Windows but some also use MacOS and some use our internal Linux spin off Ubuntu. With some internal tools and all that.

    The Linux users are primarily developers and a few Linux admins and I’m pretty sure the Linux platform is maintained by a developer.



  • Yeah, gnome seems to be something you either hate or love.

    Admittedly I haven’t used Gnome that much (because I don’t like it) but I’m in the former group, I can’t stand the UI and the UX sucks for me. Gnome really feels clunky and like change for the sake of change.

    I really like KDE though. I’m also not a fan of MacOS and especially not the way they take out the menus in programs and force it to be OS integrated. I really really hate that. The program should stay inside the program and not invade my OS.