Good. We should be in the nuclear age now with an electric infrastructure already in place and looking forward fusion and renewables.

Trying to go from fossil fuels to renewables is too difficult a step.

Why would they need to declare anything? They already are pivoting away from fossil fuels as hard as they can.

That’s nowhere near the opening scene.

Are you talking about the Sardaukar on Salusa Secondus?

Then why don’t you ask Russia to withdraw, wouldn’t that be easier?

How do you you it’s not linked to any of the other hundreds of dangerous chemicals?

There isn’t radiation in Depleted uranium.

No it won’t

“let” Ukrainians.

Your patronising colonial mask is slipping.

Ukrainians have ASKED for these weapons so they can get rid of the murderous, child torturing Russians out of their country.

Stop amplifying the propaganda of child torturers.

They are harder and penetrate armour better. So yes they will provide an advantage.

The sooner Russian occupiers are no longer murdering Ukrainians and dropping mines over every square meter of land, the less harm comes to Ukrainians.

Being invaded is worse.

The quickest way to save the most amount of lives is whatever gets rid rid of Russia the quickest.

No question.

Depleted Uranium is hardly dangerous.

Another booby trapped mine with a grenade underneath gets placed by Russians every 4 minutes.

Another Ukrainian citizen is tortured.

And now there are reports of Ukrainian children being tortured.

Bring on the napalm.

But Depleted uranium isn’t enriched uranium.

You’re lying.