Or OpenSUSE kalpa

LinuxMint’s cinnamon is there

Thanks for correcting

Please suggest how it can be more scary. I was thinking about adding compulsory steps/procedure/documentation for reproductible builds of binary/binaries alongside source code !?

OpenSUSE Aeon

Can this be circumvated saying it’s distribution rather than OS ? 🤠

Check https://bazzite.gg/

This is exactly why some of us prefer the sanity of NetBSD. Besides monoculture is bad for anything.

I like LinuxMint’s MATE theme rather than default one of gnome2

License’s focus is not vibe coding devs but in general FOSS devs but current GPL licenses doesn’t protect them from A.I. scrapping their work. This one I wish will protect their works against non FOSS LLM/A.I. models leeching their work.

Being too restrictive is international. Also I think if organisation using internally it’s difficult to enforce this specific term but it will keep them away of they are not intentional about releasing source code.

Looking forward to comment.

deleted by creator

*for now 😅

Sorry but AI is coming to Linux too so dear the 13^th 🤣

https://media.ccc.de/v/5012-the-first-encrypted-steam-deck-runs-opensuse#t=0

OpenSUSE is better than Fedora

If you are tach savvy want to tinker look for NetBSD or Ironclad OS

OpenSUSE is very less recommended but I would suggest it

https://media.ccc.de/v/5012-the-first-encrypted-steam-deck-runs-opensuse#t=0

Also check out their AEON it is still in RC but worth looking out for. Meanwhile Fedora immutable can be used with Intel.

https://ironclad-os.org/

If you want stable Linux immutable base fedora silverblue is not good option. Wait for bluefin-LTS or OpenSUSE’s Aeon which is long support stable base Without frequent breakages you mentioned.