Removed by mod

“international law” haha

Only binding in the USA. Thoroughly ignored outside of it.

I mean, many US states/cities already do forfeitures, so applying this to foreign individuals and entities is just… consistent??

Which is fine as they will also lose access to western capital markets

My muscle memory causes :wq to be typed without my conscient intervention

Agree… Too much screen real estate horizontally, not enough vertically

The BOJ is counting on low interest to force a devaluation of peoples savings to drive consumption and, given the massive amount of savings, it will take time to burn through that

Which is something I also observed. And even some trucks are electrical.

Not only that… A significant portion of cars in china are already electrical, at least in very large cities.

Unfortunately, that is the same notion shared with other neighboring muslim countries, as well the rest of other countries

A compile-time checker. Amazing

It also depends on the context

rsync with open SSH certificates is secure without prompting for any password at all

Building high quality rail networks requires legal framework to facilitate that given that initial costs are staggering. The US framework simply leaves everything to private initiative and given the multitude of local land regulation and lack of laws to support strategic mobilization at this scale, it is guaranteed the USA will never have a country-wide high speed rail network. There are just too many interests to satisfy in a very diverse legal landscape across cities, counties, and states.

That data does not contain examples of diplomacy since that stuff is generally discrete/secret

Laws of war… Pffffttttt

oh look, another of Elon Musk’s weirdly named children

Class 6 and above are pretty zippy

This is why the post and the thread are so funny (assuming people are being intentionally funny)