One for the ad free viewing. Two, premium members pay more to the creator per watch than ad viewers believe it or not.
Did it mostly for the ad removal though. Didn’t know #2 until watching a few creators explain their income on YouTube.
One for the ad free viewing. Two, premium members pay more to the creator per watch than ad viewers believe it or not.
Did it mostly for the ad removal though. Didn’t know #2 until watching a few creators explain their income on YouTube.
I’m not a content creator, do pay for premium, and this looks like hot garbage.
I tried something like this with Traefik just recently using add prefix and strip prefix rules. It had limited success until until I encountered an application that doesn’t have everything behind a sub path, Like /lovelace (home assistant)or something like that. If the application just basis it off the host with a root path, than you can’t really apply the prefix rule as the reverse proxy will not know how to route the request as the application is asking for a path that is not already a sub. You may come into this situation more often with several applications. I ended up just switching back to virtual hosts myself.
I would also apply this to refactorings!!
Neat. I’ve used freetube before as well. But I keep wondering that if I’m paying for ad free and creators get more money from my views, how do the ad-free and privacy apps benefit the people that I watch regularly?
Though, I could pay every person I watch via patron, but I watch a lot of creators and not all at the same time. It would be too expensive to support them all through patreon vs YouTube unfortunately