afaict they just run the LSP automatically when the agent uses the file edit tool, passing errors/warnings as a response of the tool. Maybe they run it before and after to get only the warnings introduced after the change, maybe they filter by the lines changed, I’m not sure.
something is wrong with my instance, I’m not getting any ads here
Btrfs is usually last in perf benchmarks, so I wouldn’t do it myself
in fact, I have regretted using btrfs because it made my laptop noticeably slower
the phoronix benchmark posted in this thread uses artificial loads and doesn’t compare performance against other file systems, just compression on vs off for btrfs
good to know!
heavily depends on the model and quantization level
choose the model you want on this website and it’ll give you some specs likely to run it
any/most distros will do, especially if you run it on Docker
if you’re going with intel cards (best $ per GB VRAM right now), you could get a decent machine under $3k
right, but remote code execution comes in many different ways. Having a machine vulnerable to this kind of privilege escalation is a really bad thing.
wdym by duplicating?
I’ve been seeing this for a long time now, as they blocked VPN and anonymous access, so I use a combination of cached pages and libredirect if I really want to bother going there.
micro for sensible defaults out of the box, and because I don’t like modal editors.
wtf
An unprivileged local user can write 4 controlled bytes into the page cache of any readable file on a Linux system, and use that to gain root.
If your kernel was built between 2017 and the patch — which covers essentially every mainstream Linux distribution — you’re in scope.
how does that only get a CVE score of 7.8
ok, to start with, if you need a POSIX interface to the filesystem, you already have an SSH connection to that server, and don’t need much stability across multiple clients, SSHFS may do just fine. For a homelab, that is likely the case.
now, if you’re hosting a web server that needs data distributed across drives/nodes, data redundancy, and the usage is primarily programmatic, closer to a CDN’s or machine learning pipeline than a single user browsing files; then you want an S3-compatible solution. The S3 API makes it easier to plug it into your application, while allowing you to migrate to a different one - which I’m actually currently doing for a MinIO deployment at work.
SSHFS is a hack and has nothing to do with the proposal of S3 compatible backends
“Native installs are trash. Always have issues resolving dependencies and compiling from source. I’ve tried it for a while but at some point you want to get work done instead of having to resolve why libxcomposite is not available”
yeah, about twice a year I use the CLI to backup my vault, and I’ve never felt comfortable installing an npm package to handle my vault. Now I’m definitely sandboxing it in a rootless container without internet next time. And installing a week old version, or older.
containers
reposting the tl;dr I wrote from another community…
Yesterday, for about 1h30min (starting at 5:57pm ET / 21:57 UTC) anyone installing the latest version of the command line interface of bitwarden was installing malware.
The malware steals GitHub/npm tokens, .ssh, .env, shell history, GitHub Actions and cloud secrets, then exfiltrates the data to private domains and as GitHub commits and doesn’t seem to be targeting Bitwarden specifically, or user vaults.
There’s no evidence that end user vault data was accessed or at risk, or that production data or production systems were compromised, according to their official statement.
It seems there were 334 bitwarden CLI downloads in this time period, some or many of which might have been from bots, so this is a higher bound to the number of affected users.
framework as in the laptop brand, or…?
Because if so, I think you can also install arch/arch-based and have bleeding edge
Each screen can now switch between any of the system’s virtual desktops independently!
no way, I thought this would never be a thing! Been wanting this for over 3 years now.
is that a bundle, or are you rally paying like $0.50 a month for a VPS?