I meant it doesn’t need to be perfect. It only needs to just barely as good as the people it replaces and appear cheaper on a balance sheet/cash flow statement for the quarter. Otherwise every service company wouldn’t be buying crap ‘AI’ chat bots for all customer facing duties.

Alternatively, self driving vehicles are probably already better than the bottom 50% of drivers in 50% of situations. I.e. driving on a road. We still want flawed human oversight of that.

Well, the employees it’s replacing are not perfect…

It just needs to be cheaper.

Well, 365 * 10 certainly doesn’t ;-)

I use several dirt cheap ($20) tp-link branded 1Gig cards, they probably just have a crappy realtek chip.

Absolutely no issues.

But, again, is just a simple home network.

UK stretching its ol’ colonial muscles again.

Depending on your jurisdiction, your local commerce regulator might have a different opinion of the legality of this that VW, especially when they’re taking away features you already paid for.

Attacked in the same way one might attack a salad.

The UK government have been three facists in a trench coat for decades.

The politicization of citizenship rights is something that really worries me, I think it’s just flatly inconsistent with our democratic system

Even the opponents just spew out weasel words.

I’m sorry, your country is fucked; so if y’all could try and keep that fuckery within your borders, that’d be great.

It was about the perception and deliberately not about the fact.

Given it’s the perception I’m talking about then effectively covering it up counts.

That’s why I didn’t use the US as the counter example.

Without having to verify the claim, that it’s plausible is bad enough.

Substitute another military and see how it tracks.

The British SAS lined up…

Nope, doesn’t track.

It’s called X now.

F12 should open the browser developer tools, one panel will be the network requests.

It could be the accepts header then… check if the request includes accetps: application/json

In my experience that is almost always the server returning an html error page.

Start with inspecting that actual response the first character is probably <. The rest of it is likely to be a “not found” or “internal server error” (being the most common) page.

Then look at logs…

Gnome makes absolutely no promises of version compatibility for extensions.

You’re stuck waiting for an extension dev to update to support the new gnome version.

Ah. I figured it was plausible enough to ask for a source rather than out right rejected as bullshit.

I see now that was a “got a source to back up that outlandish claim?”

Agreed. That it’s even plausible is a sad state of affairs.

It’s no less bat shit crazy than what we do have sources for.