IDEs have come a long way. But I’ve done qt development using Jetbrains Clion IDE and QTCreator. I don’t remember it being that difficult. Then again, I started programming using Turbo Pascal and Turbo C. So …
IDEs have come a long way. But I’ve done qt development using Jetbrains Clion IDE and QTCreator. I don’t remember it being that difficult. Then again, I started programming using Turbo Pascal and Turbo C. So …
I dunno. Having worked with Java and c#, web dev, c++, I found working with QT in C++ to be so much easier.
I agree.
Unfortunately, from experience, nobody seems to have time for that. They just learn git pull, push, add, commit and merge and that’s about it.
Sometimes they’ll use checkout and end up in detached head and have a panic attack. That’s when I come in. lol
Yeah that’s what I did as a workaround. Reset (soft) to the first parent commit and do a single commit with all the changes.
What I do locally on my branch is my own business.
Honestly, when doing a merge/pull request into the parent branch, that’s when you squash. You don’t need the entire history of a development branch in main.
Yeah I saw someone else’s answer and I totally learned something new today.
Holy shit! I never took the time to read about it rerere. But it all makes sense now.
However, it’s still a lot of extra steps for what could otherwise be really simple with a regular merge.
Is there really a big advantage in using rebase vs merge other than trying to keep a single line of progress in the history? It’s it really worth all the hassle? Especially if you’re using a squash merge in a pull request…
All it can take is one commit in the parent branch. If your branch has many commits because you’re a commit freak then your fucked.
I consider myself above average in terms of Git know how. But I’ve come across situations using rebase where you’re stuck resolving the same conflicts over several commits.
I still don’t understand that part quite well.
This doesn’t happen when you do a normal merge though. Making it easier to manage
You need to merge more often.
Rebase. That’s where the real trauma is.
They used the Hannibal protocol on October 7th. They’re not afraid to kill their own. I’d bet most of the casualties from Israel’s side is because of their own army shooting or shelling them.
Oh ok cool! I’m going to check it out.
I’m taking a lot of notes for my next install. Trying to build something solid with Kubuntu.
I’m curious now about BTRFS.
How do you roll back in case of problems?
At login, press ctrl-alt-f4 or f5 or one of the F* keys until you get a text based login screen. (Might need to press enter on a blank screen for the login to appear)
Login as your user and password.
Sudo apt install kubuntu-desktop
Sorry buddy. But you live in la la land.
Voting a third option will get Trump elected. The right is united behind him. If everyone else splits their vote, there doing to lose.
I fully understand your concerns. But this is the reality and I know it sucks.
So if you expect there won’t be any protest and that people at just doing to fold over (like what happened in Italy or Germany) then what do you think is the best option???
THERE IS NO THIRD OPTION.
You can criticize Biden, and you would be right. But I’m asking the question again. What would you rather have?
When using KDE, press meta-T to activate the equivalent of Windows Power Toys’ Fancy Zones.
You can then set tiling zones and when you drag a window, hold shift at the same time to lock it in one of the zones.