Yup. This is the last vestiges of the diminishing returns of the doomed strategy of blaming consumers for climate change.
Yup. This is the last vestiges of the diminishing returns of the doomed strategy of blaming consumers for climate change.
Yes, but I haven’t seen the footage, I’m so incredibly busy you see. So I couldn’t possibly remark on whether or not this is or was a war crime. And, actually, it’s really quite gauche of you to ask, to be perfectly honest.
Edit: context
Vegans are allowed the exception on moral grounds.
We know their side: “Blahblah tragic blahblah right to defend ourselves blahblah human shields”. Same answer every time they do a war crime.
The focus isn’t on that though, and while you and The Leader of the Free World™ prevaricate and wish for a perfect solution, children are being slaughtered in their thousands. The focus, in my opinion, should be on stopping that slaughter immediately. You know, with a ceasefire or something.
You’ve misread my comment I think. Unions can coordinate and organise together. So nobody would be leaving their fellow worker to fight by themselves.
Not so. It makes sense to organise in trade unions. The heads of those unions are on the same side most of the time, as it would be in this case, and they can easily coordinate their actions. But in some cases the interests of one trade have no bearing on another, or are even in opposition, in which case it would be somewhere between difficult and impossible to organise a balloted action across the entire union. Thus nullifying the strength of the union and playing right into the capitalist’s hands.
Nice! I’ve read the manifesto, most of Das Kapital and some of his essays and his thinking is a big part of my worldview. I’m reading “at the café” by Malatesta at the moment and I think I like it enough to recommend.
I’m not into identity politics either. I am far left, anti authority, pro-worker, pro-human, pro-science. Lots of things. What about you?
I’m not a liberal because I hold strong anti-capitalist views, for one example.
What do you want to know? Do you want me to label myself? PolComp score? What?
Or, I’m considering your argument which is supported by your evidence that some US citizens aided homophobia in other parts of the world. What was that again?
No worries
Yep. They don’t prove the US is a queerphobic dictatorship. Not even close. I don’t know what more to say. Maybe you should open your mind a bit? There is some pretty good literature out there on the nature and inherent value of truth that might be illuminating for you.
And one last thing. I’m not a liberal. Not everyone who you argue with is.
I’m sorry, the claims are not supported by the provided links.
There has been nothing wrong with my arguments. Acting like there has just doesn’t make it so.
Is it against some rule of yours to ask for evidence?
. At this point you are either trolling or acting in such bad faith you may as well be.
Glad to have surprised you. And yet, if you actually parse what I’m saying, you’ll see that the evidence in providing is a presumed lack of testimony being evidence of a lack of acceptance which indicates a comparison which is favourable to my argument.
There definitely is an element of people just not liking it because it’s new, but there’s also an element of not getting any say in it whatsoever.
Also, they really do get in the way. They make it harder to get a good seal between your mouth and the bottle at any angle, and at the top they hit your nose. They are slightly harder to use, especially if you’re using one hand for any reason, including if you only have one hand. Removing them without tools results in a sharp bit of plastic which pokes and irritates your skin.
Finally, this is another patronising effort which makes consumers lives more difficult (by whatever amount) while not doing enough to combat plastic waste.