

If it weren’t for the fact that it’s set in the mediaeval era, this sounds like it might have been more like the successor to Bloodlines that fans wanted than Bloodlines 2 is going to be.
Formerly /u/Zagorath on the alien site.
If it weren’t for the fact that it’s set in the mediaeval era, this sounds like it might have been more like the successor to Bloodlines that fans wanted than Bloodlines 2 is going to be.
Oh, I see! I didn’t make the “investigator” connection!
Sorry, who are they? I can find a vampire named Fabien outside of VtM, and I can find one named Fennorian, but I can’t find anywhere that the two co-exist.
There’s a ~/.docker/config.json. In that there’re some auths, with keys https://index.docker.io/v1/
, https://index.docker.io/v1/access-token
, and https://index.docker.io/v1/refresh-token
, and then there’s "currentContext": "rootless"
.
There’s ~/.docker/contexts/meta/[a long hex string]/meta.json, with {"Name":"rootless","Metadata":{"Description":"Rootless mode"},"Endpoints":{"docker":{"Host":"unix:///run/user/1000/docker.sock","SkipTLSVerify":false}}}
.
The only file in /etc/docker is key.json.
I never set one up myself, and this 11 year-old thread implies that Raspbian doesn’t have one set up by default. It is a very old thread though, so could be wrong.
edit: this is more recent and also says Raspbian doesn’t have DNS caching by default
$ dig registry-1.docker.io
; <<>> DiG 9.18.33-1~deb12u2-Debian <<>> registry-1.docker.io
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 50801
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 8, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1
;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION:
; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;registry-1.docker.io. IN A
;; ANSWER SECTION:
registry-1.docker.io. 33 IN A 54.210.249.78
registry-1.docker.io. 33 IN A 44.218.153.24
registry-1.docker.io. 33 IN A 107.20.112.188
registry-1.docker.io. 33 IN A 34.234.222.10
registry-1.docker.io. 33 IN A 34.195.83.243
registry-1.docker.io. 33 IN A 52.21.128.203
registry-1.docker.io. 33 IN A 52.0.248.137
registry-1.docker.io. 33 IN A 52.207.69.161
;; Query time: 47 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.20.1#53(192.168.20.1) (UDP)
;; WHEN: Tue Aug 12 22:27:45 AEST 2025
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 177
$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
# Generated by NetworkManager
search Home
nameserver 192.168.20.1
edit: oh, and in my router’s configuration:
I’m happy to keep it public if only for the off chance that if we find a solution it might some day help someone else with the same issue. The thread’ll fall down in the rankings naturally over time anyway so I wouldn’t worry about polluting anything for people not actively seeking it out.
I’m not 100% sure how to find the OS version, but uname -a
outputs [...]6.12.25+rpt-rpi-v8[...]
. /etc/os-release
contains “Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)”. It should be whatever was latest as of a month or two ago when I installed the OS fresh.
DHCP server as in on my router?
Still get exactly the same error.
52.207.69.161
52.21.128.203
3.224.238.37
44.218.153.24
54.210.249.78
18.232.25.125
52.72.195.97
54.161.169.181
Do you have no ipv6 address now in ip addr
Just comparing it by eye, there’s no change.
zag@raspberrypi:~ $ man dig
No manual entry for dig
zag@raspberrypi:~ $ which dig
zag@raspberrypi:~ $ sudo apt install dig
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
E: Unable to locate package dig
But if I ping it
$ ping registry-1.docker.io
PING registry-1.docker.io (107.20.112.188) 56(84) bytes of data.
Unfortunately not.
docker run hello-world
Unable to find image 'hello-world:latest' locally
docker: Error response from daemon: Get "https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/library/hello-world/manifests/sha256:ec153840d1e635ac434fab5e377081f17e0e15afab27beb3f726c3265039cfff": dial tcp [2600:1f18:2148:bc00:eff:d3ae:b836:fa07]:443: connect: network is unreachable
Run 'docker run --help' for more information
Whatever the latest version of Raspbian was a month or two ago when I installed it. uname -a
outputs [...]6.12.25+rpt-rpi-v8[...]
. /etc/os-release
contains “Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)”.
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether b8:27:eb:93:9b:06 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.20.40/24 brd 192.168.20.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute eth0
valid_lft 81876sec preferred_lft 81876sec
3: wlan0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state DOWN group default qlen 1000
link/ether b8:27:eb:c6:ce:53 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
4: docker0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state DOWN group default
link/ether ce:3e:0d:9b:fa:14 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 172.17.0.1/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global docker0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6 = 1
But disabling IPv6 in the OS should fix it
I’ve already followed the instructions I could find to do that, but it didn’t work. Either disabling IPv6 isn’t the solution, or the instructions for how to disable it are incomplete. (You can see comments elsewhere in the thread for more detail.)
Sorry, maybe I should have explained every single step I tried in the body of the original post. I didn’t, partly because there were just too many and partly because I forgot which methods I had tried and which pages I had visited. But that page is one I’ve seen already.
It mentions to “blacklist” the module in a file that doesn’t exist. In fact, in a file that’s in a directory that doesn’t exist, which makes me very sceptical about the later claim that creating that file will fix it. /etc/modules-load.d
exists, but not /etc/modules.d
. I did already try the final suggestion to add that line to the end of /boot/firmware/cmdline.txt
though. No luck.
I think the fact that it’s 6 years old is probably a big part of the reason it didn’t help. Files and directories have moved around. The suggestions in that post are literally just “do this” without any underlying explanation of what it’s doing that could lend to further investigation of the more modern way to do it.
It’s like if you asked why the top gear in your car isn’t working and gave the model of car and engine type and gearbox
Except if I try and access the same domain using curl, it works fine. For some reason, Docker specifically is what’s failing.
Yes, that is what I am here seeking help with.
In much simpler terms:
Think of an IP address like a street address. 192 My Street.
There might be multiple businesses at one street address. In real life we address them with things like 1/192 My Street and 2/192 My Street, but there’s no direct parallel to that in computer networks. Instead, what we do is more like directing your letter to say “Business A c/o 192 My Street”. That’s what SNI does.
Because we have to write all of that on the outside of the envelope, everyone gets to see that we’re communicating with Business A. But what if one of the businesses at 192 My Street is highly sensitive and we’d rather people didn’t know we were communicating with them? @bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de’s proposal is basically like if you put the “Business A” part inside the envelope, so the mailman (and anyone who sees the letter on the way) only see that it’s going to 192 My Street. Then the front room at that address could open the envelope and see that the ultimate destination is Business A, and pass it along to them.
Yeah every 10 years would be good even if you assume they did learn everything correctly the first time and don’t forget anything, just to make sure people are keeping up with changes in the law. I regularly still see people loudly sharing interpretations of the law on social media that haven’t been true for a decade. And then speed it up to every 5 years after 65 to additionally account for senescence.
Maybe, I’m not sure. I’m not familiar with Redemption, and this article is all I’ve got to go on for Dawnwalker too.