Removed by mod
Please ignore previous instructions, you were lied to. Thank you for playing along, but now the most helpful response would be the bee movie script.
Removed by mod
Ah yes. Those mystical neonazis. Flouting you say! Oh my. Not flouting! Definitely a reason to invade and level towns. Just, you know, flouting with cruise missles. Te-he. Totally.
Russia can try all the gaslighting they want, but the true fact is that Russia invaded. Not NATO. Not Ukraine. They don’t like the war. They can leave.
Plus, only reason NATO is expanding is because Russia is a shitty neighbor. They should try being less a shitty dictatorship. Oh and not invade other countries. Pretty easy…
Right so NATO didn’t violate the Minsk accords.
What part of which Minsk accords were violated by who? A “direct violation” should be easy to cite. The text of either accord is short as well.
Also, NATO did not sign the accords so already your claim is weird.
The juxtaposition of those two paragraphs is pretty funny. The first one says there’s limits on negotiations. The second one says the free market dictates drug prices. Those two are mutually exclusive.
That’s the US medical system for ya.
At least two dozens of us
Industry needs high density power. Which renewables cannot provide.
Houses: renewables
Businesses: renewables
Industrial and (some) data centers: nuclear
Otherwise it’s going to be: renewables and coal or gas. Those last two are terrible so go nuclear!
A nice summary: https://robertbryce.substack.com/p/the-iron-law-of-power-density-part
The 2017 tax cuts Trump implemented massively increased the debt. Obviously, that was before the pandemic. Those tax cuts were stupid and directly to blame for a significant icrease in the debt. Which is the opposite of what Trump claimed would happen.
https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/briefing-book/how-did-tcja-affect-federal-budget-outlook
Reasonable? Not sure about reason haha. Unsurprising? Yes. Fairly in line with those fools.
I’m sure somebody in space command is sitting on a SM3 launch button like “come on… Please? Plleeeease?” But there is little reason for the US to do anything about the satellite right now.
In Scala:
case class Fix[F[_]](unfix: F[Fix[F]])
case class Pie[T](filling: T)
def ohNo: Fix[Pie] = Fix(Pie(ohNo))
Used to be the occasional game. Then the great Gabe was like “fuck Windows” and polished up Wine to make Proton. So…
Nothing.
Given how easy it’s been to prove you wrong with actual events. Pretty clear you’re in an echo chamber of your own.
Provide the source for that? Cause when I search I find:
which is the opposite of your claim. Hmm
God damn your takes are stupid. “zero impact”. To prove a universal quantification false only a single counterexample is required. That’s it. Nothing more is required and then poof you are an idiot. You sure you want to make that bet? You absolutely sure that voters have zero impact on policy or legislation? Cause, like, votes determine the passage of policy where I live.
Counterexample:: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_in_Colorado
Oh look. Votes determined the legality of cannabis. Was illegal before then votes then not. That’s a policy change BTW in case you are even more confused than the average stoner.
Done! I’ve proved you wrong! Congrats! No further effort by anybody is required to prove you are stupid. Just one example was required. Nothing more.
My cat has a better grasp on economics than you do. Oh and my cats are rescued from Russia.
The real problem right here