Here’s an exhaustive list of modern replacements:

https://github.com/ibraheemdev/modern-unix/blob/master/README.md

The encryption key is stored remotely and can be retrieved through the Microsoft account

But surely this petition with nearly 400 signatures will convince them there’s a business case for supporting Linux!

This sums up my opinion of the new Assassins Creed. It’s a beautiful world but half the time I can’t actually see anything because I’m either blinded by sunlight or shaded by darkness.

Yep, I’m with you. Project Bluefin is exactly what I want from an OS. My previous Linux experiences had all been awful UX, having to diagnose obscure issues and copy pasting decipherable terminal commands. Until Bluefin, nothing ever worked straight out of the box.

Bluefin’s main issue right now is a lack of good documentation. Like you, I’ve tried to get devcontainers working and they just don’t.

What you’re describing aren’t issues with Wayland.

Your complaints are that you’re using old versions and poorly designed software.

Those aren’t Wayland issues they’re poor management and lack of investment

That’s not semantic versioning…

It could be implemented the same as most email clients do. A simple message “load external content” with an option to always load.

What do you do differently? I’ve been on Bluefin for 2 years but still never bothered with dev containers or anything

It’s hardly diminishing your anonymity. There are plenty of services to create an anonymous email account.

6. I actively chose software written in Rust over other software, even if it’s not better, and I argue that it is.

Rust has quite a high barrier for entry which is likely to deter inexperienced developers. I’d say that’s enough justification to favour software written in Rust.

Python on the other hand is far too easy to get started with, thus the ecosystem is plagued with terrible software. I avoid it like the plague. Yes, there some decent projects written in Python but they are rare things

Didn’t even need remote version control. All it required was essential files version controlled in the local folder.

Your comment “This question does not belong here.” currently has 22 downvotes and 1 upvote.

To me that suggests your view is in the minority.

There was a discussion about “ghost communities” a few days ago:

https://feddit.uk/post/24499702

People are quick to create communities but they sit unused, attract few posts and fewer subscribers. Often the mods move on so even if new posts were to appear they’d be unmoderated.

The simple reason for that is there isn’t enough demand. Lemmy is still small it’s too early to be spinning out ever more narrowed niche communities. If you think content belongs elsewhere then report it to the mods and let them decide. If they see a surge in unwanted Q&A topics then they can amend posting guidelines to direct people elsewhere or to a Q&A thread or something.

Creating a new community for one question is insane.

If there’s a surge in questions not relevant to 90% of readers then sure but Lemmy isn’t there yet

Is there an easy way of seeing the preceding emails in a threaded format?

I read some posted yesterday that were related but it’s damn confusing whether the conversation has been active in between?

https://feddit.uk/comment/15366243

@dengtav@lemmy.ml

This answer is probably the best here. It’s concise and answers your questions in a reasonably unbiased way.

A lot of the other answers are dripping with personal bias and a few verging on conspiracy.

OP wants to store all of their porn collection in RAM

There’s a lot more detail in this BBC story but it still seems likely there’s an injunction against publishing any specifics of the lies MI5 told.

My interpretation is that “Beth” was assaulted on multi occasions by a right wing MI5 informant. She reported this to the police and the suspect was arrested. However while in custody the suspect insisted he was an MI5 operative and MI5 was contacted, MI5 then intervened and had the informant was released.

Most likely MI5 then lied about intervening (the false evidence) but the BBC have clear evidence that MI5 took charge of evidence. Thus MI5’s lies were exposed.

The police did not take a full statement from Beth or obtain the video of her being attacked. The CPS quickly discontinued the prosecution.

The police force concerned and the CPS insist the case was discontinued due to lack of evidence.

Police said they did not seize any items as part of their own investigation, and were “unable to advise when or why these were taken”.

This was untrue, as the police force concerned was responsible for calling in counter terror officers.

The police claim that property had been returned to X was also untrue - the material had been given to MI5.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-61508520

That’s actually insane.

I wonder if they’ve just sent out a generic rejection without checking it.