Few people will remember him, but if any are spurred into action by his act, then it won’t be a completely wasteful loss of life.
Few people will remember him, but if any are spurred into action by his act, then it won’t be a completely wasteful loss of life.
Online sovereign citizen?
It does make sense, but priorities are different so it’s less noticeable.
From a military point of view, starving the enemy is a victory in itself. Means fewer numbers to deal with.
And that’s all these people are to them, the enemy.
An IAF soldier reading this article:
“Aww, how sad. I wonder if there’s anything I could do to help? Ooh, I know!”
He then proceeds to scribble “Bread” on one of the munitions he’s loading.
A second soldier notices this and comes near.
“Hey man, that’s not cool. What’s she going to do with just one bread? We need a dozen loaves at least!”
He starts scribbling as well.
Their commander looks on speechless and shakes his head at their antics.
“What a bunch of degenerates.”
He places his own marker aside and goes to reprimand his subordinates. Behind him a missile newly babtized ‘Dildo of Doom’ lies in silence.
Still worthy of pity and serve as a life lesson.
It’s ok. Russian state is going to take them in, train them for a few years at an undisclosed location and then send them back to their original country where they can run for office or something.
To be happy at other people’s misfortune is not ok.
That being said, hah! Dumbasses!
It might have to do with grouping. Use less for one lump, use fewer for individual count.
Very unique was originally an insult veiled as an unintentionally incorrect usage of the expression. The hidden meaning could be explained as “I think it’s retarded but I don’t want to say that in public.”
Source: chick movies.
As for Jealous vs Envious. Are you sure it isn’t merely your perception that’s mistaking the use?
I know I tend to confuse the two because one wants something that resembles what you have and the other wants what you have directly.
So the perception of those involved can mix up the two concepts in this regard.
You are correct. And yet, I feel I must send a “whatever you think you know about what I’ve done and what I’ve seen, it’s not nearly as much as you think you know” right back at you, random internet acquaintance.
You worked in IT, not with IT. You made the bugs, but didn’t experience them.
Your tradition is having users calling you for the dumbest of things and everyone you know calling you to fix their electronics.
We are not the same.
First of all, as a time honored tradition it is customary to say this: Never, ever trust an autosave. Manual saves and backup, always.
With that out of the way, yeah, libre office is kinda bad at the regular user stuff. If you aren’t a fiddler who goes through options first and sets their own personal preferences, a bad time will be had.
Also, apparently crashes might reset the auto save tick depending on the version used, so check twice if it happens again just to make sure.
Ps: Never had an issue with it personally, but it’s hit or miss with its users.
Dumbasses can’t see that Gaza kept them safe.
I think it’s primogeniture monarchy, so it’s from parent to child. Next in line is Charles’ firstborn.
Excuse my lack of cybersex knowledge, but if you plug in an infected appendage to a hub, then can’t that hub become infected as well and pass along the STI to any other appendage plugged in?
Far as I remember, wearing a condom isn’t a guaranteed protection against infections.
One doesn’t need to work in cybersec to know that the vast majority of attacks work because the targeted users have personal dum-dum moments.
XCOM: Enemy Within. Finished a game over two days because everyone kept missing their attacks, even the planes. Even the enemies.
Gonna do a second wave marathon and then maybe move on to XCOM 2.
I’m gonna arbitrarily say it’s fake.
Unless you can find convincing articles saying otherwise in the pirating scene, I’d consider it a virus and move on.
Nah, I think that was for Sweden joining Nato after a side of EU paid Orban off. There was some internal disagreement on that, so this one is probably trying to redress it.
It’s about pay. If the market is flooded, the hospitals will be free to lower their wages substantially because they’ll have more replacements available or they’ll be working with more people on the same budget.