Because Microsoft is updating to add ads to the 10 start menu is one reason. Security probably outweighs that, but it’s super annoying.
Because Microsoft is updating to add ads to the 10 start menu is one reason. Security probably outweighs that, but it’s super annoying.
Yeah, but the biggest push was around WWII in response to persecution. But anyway, the circumstances are very very different.
That background you’re referring to is what’s different. The middle east was never part of the Soviet Union, nor was Ukraine claimed by zionist Holocaust displaced Jews.
I and a lot of people here support Ukraine and reject Israels actions in Palestine. But those two cases are also entirely different in a lot of ways, not just the ethnicity of the relevant people.
How do you figure that?
Didn’t know about the collateral damage. Would you be okay with it if it was only the Russian soldiers?
But Wagner is now openly a branch of the Russian military. So why would this be an attack to Mali?
Mali considers attacks on Wagner mercenaries terrorism? I thought that was just regular warfare.
Nuclear is pretty good for base load, but they’re building may of those too.
The space race also created all sorts of new materials and technologies, but renewables would be more directly applicable.
Because if China is holding steady on fossil fuels while absorbing polluting industries, other countries like the US have no excuse at all.
That’s also largely because the US has outsourced polluting industries to places like China. So reducing emissions while increasing industry and physical production is harder, but it looks like China is working towards it.
So is coal power production going down, or are renewables growing faster?
Edit: looks like they’re still adding coal capacity
If it drives more investment, I’m all for it.
Inflation accounts for the price of actual goods. GDP tries to measure how much stuff you’re making. If you make the exact amount of stuff as last year but have 7% inflation, you’re GDP would grow by 7%. So to find out how much stuff a country is actually making, you use inflation adjusted real GDP.
But if you aren’t using real GDP (inflation adjusted) than the numbers are largely useless, especially in cases of high inflation like Russia.
Doesn’t that mean the economy is shrinking since the 5% growth is less than the 7% inflation? (Inflation might be actually higher than that too) I didn’t think that figure is using real gdp.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/276323/monthly-inflation-rate-in-russia/
It’s oriented towards the war, but it’s not a total war economy yet because the population wouldn’t tolerate it. It’s similar to the US at war in Vietnam, spending only got up to 8% to 10% of gdp.
Could you link a source for growth in those areas? Especially accounting for real inflation?
I’ve found it’s pretty good matching up with predictions.
Isn’t the guy at the zeroith table?