Because it wasn’t obvious to me from the article, and I was trying to figure out whose sovereign tech fund it is:
The Sovereign Tech Agency is financed by the German Federal Ministry for Digital Transformation and Government Modernisation and is a subsidiary of SPRIND, the Federal Agency for Disruptive Innovation.
So, I’ll get the guaranteed highest price with no flexibility for reality, and this is an improvement?
It’s an improvement to the people who matter to Google, i.e. not you
You did sum up really well why these corporations might want their ‘agents’ automating our lives
For me the scariest thing someone could do on my pc is exfiltrate all the data from my home directory which is readable by my user account.
Maybe I’m misunderstanding you, but that’s harm to me without root access.
I looked for info and didn’t find anything.
Obviously you could decode the code on the device that’s showing it, so why not also provide a link?
I have to assume that it’s because the mobile device must be one where they can check that you’re only running google approved software (play integrity or whatever it’s called these days, maybe the apple equivalent).
Still team Emacs. We’re a team because we use elisp, not because of something trivial like how our text editors work.
This is a good article because it immediately made me feel stupid for not knowing about O_PATH.
I really need to figure out a better sandboxing method for shells. It’s crazy to be things where my keys, browser data, shell history are all accessible.
I do try to use firejail where possible, but it’s quite cumbersome. Every so often I look for tools to help with this, but everything is oriented around making a specific program (e.g. Firefox, steam) work.
Wouldn’t the transmission be directional to a satellite or possibly other aircraft? It doesn’t seem like something that would be useful on the ground.
Yes, and you can do the same thing to your child’s non-root account. The point of the California law is to allow admins (parents) to do that.
Every app does not need to check your birth date. An app will be able to query if the user is within one of a few broad ranges of age (e.g. under 18), but an app only has to do that if it needs to comply with some other legislation.
The California law essentially allows a parent to create a child account on a device and gives a way for apps to query it.
I’m not sure what PH is asking for, but it doesn’t sound like the same thing.
But in 1945, for the first time since the age of Columbus, it was contracting.
So the point of this speech was: don’t make the mistake of fighting fascism again.
I don’t think you’re wrong to consider this a privacy problem, but lots of people happily stream their gameplay publicly, so not everyone’s going to have the same expectation of privacy.
It obviously won’t work for everyone, but for remote access I’ve been very impressed with waypipe. I use it to pull windows from headless machines onto my main workstation, like X forwarding.
I’d like something for persistence, like wprs, but it’s not quite there yet.
I don’t usually wish for a crane disaster.
Strange, I’ve never seen that. Have you rebooted the system to make sure it has nothing to do with open files?
I did find one thread that seems related:
https://www.reddit.com/r/btrfs/comments/lip3dk/unreachable_data_on_btrfs_according_to_btdu/
btdu is an excellent tool for finding out what’s taking up space in btrfs
Sorry for the duplicate replies. Lemmy server drama…
That’s a tricky one if you’re getting no info from the kernel. I think the reply above about system instability under load sounds promising. Throttling things down to test seems like a good idea.
Were you running dmesg on another screen or over ssh or something? I’d look in journalctl -b-1 after a reboot.
Is it completely frozen or does it respond to pings etc?
A glass-half-full type of person would say they’ve created a $1B business opportunity for General Atomics