The phrase “tax the rich” can be “just as hateful as some disgusting racial slurs”, according to the New York City billionaire Steve Roth, who said that the top 1% should be “praised and thanked”.

Speaking on his company’s quarterly earnings call on Tuesday, Roth, the CEO of Vornado Realty Trust, expressed his support for fellow billionaire and the CEO of Citadel, Ken Griffin, who was singled out in the 15 April announcement by New York’s mayor, Zohran Mamdani, of the state’s first “pied-à-terre” tax on second homes valued at more than $5m. In a video, Mamdani announced the policy in front of Griffin’s penthouse, which he said was purchased for $238m.

“We are all shocked that our young mayor would pull this stunt in front of Ken’s home and single him out for ridicule,” Roth said. “This was both irresponsible and dangerous.”

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 minutes ago

    Quite unlikely that any of his ancestors worked the cotton fields. He probably thinks he’s a self made man.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    53 seconds ago

    He views the Rich as a separate ethnic group.

    from wiki:

    An ethnicity or ethnic group is a group of humans who identify with each other on the basis of perceived shared attributes that distinguish them from other groups. Attributes that ethnicities believe to share include language, culture, common sets of ancestry, traditions, society, religion, history, or social treatment.

    He’s mostly right, but that doesn’t invalidate criticisms of the Rich.

  • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 hours ago
    1. Overwhelmingly rich isn’t a race
    2. There are ways to solve being rich
    3. There are other options if you don’t like those but bring a pillow for your head to land on.
        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I can see if we make this argument, they will then say the same thing about being poor. And then take it further to say the poor should not be a protected class and therefore should not receive extra benefits. (I know this is not what protected class typically refers to, but I can see them making these arguments.)

          • 4am@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            38 minutes ago

            No need to hypothesize, they’ve been doing this since the New Deal

  • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    “We want you to pay your fair share of taxes to maintain the system you enjoy the benefits and protection of.” = slur?

    Eat all of my shit and hair, Steve Roth. You sound like a real turd of a human being.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    4 hours ago

    "He will learn over time that growing a tax base is a winner and raising taxes is a loser … and that the hard-working 1% are allies, not enemies.”

    Translation: “we’re still working on finding ways to make him do our bidding”

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Tax is the compromise

    The French have a good historical case for what should happen if that fails

  • Oofnik@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “I must say that I consider the phrase ‘tax the rich’ – quote tax the rich – spit out with anger and contempt by politicians both here and across the country, to be just as hateful as some disgusting racial slurs, and even the phrase from the ‘river to the sea’,” he said, referring to the controversial pro-Palestinian slogan.

    A LOT to unpack here.