Maryland has become the first state in the US to ban surveillance pricing in grocery stores.

Maryland’s law bans grocers and third-party delivery services from using a person’s personal data to set higher prices. Wes Moore, the governor, signed the measure into law on Tuesday. “At a time when technology can predict what we need, when we need it, when we’ll pay for it and also – when we’ll pay more for it, and at a time when we’re watching how big companies are then using these analytics against us to make record profits, Maryland is not just pushing back. Maryland is pushing forward because we are going to protect our people,” Moore said at the bill signing ceremony.

When engaging in surveillance pricing, stores rapidly change the cost of products based on consumer data, including their location, internet search history and demographics. That means buyers are paying different prices for the same items purchased around the same time. Critics of this method – also known as dynamic pricing – say that in doing so, businesses are effectively charging each person the most that they’re willing to pay.

  • XLE@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Oh no. Loopholes. The surveillance isn’t even banned, just some kinds of pricing.

    How hard is it to just say “don’t”? That would solve so many more problems.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 hours ago

        In the article.

        While the law bans setting higher prices through surveillance pricing, it doesn’t address reducing prices. If a company raises its prices for everyone, and then offers individualized discounts, “suddenly you’ve arrived at the same outcome,” McBrien says.

        • Blake (he/him) @beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That’s how it’s always been though? If the general price is too high odds are people will look elsewhere, no matter how many great coupons there are. To make the difference you’d have to peddle thousands or hundreds of thousands of individualized discounts and fundamentally change consumer behaviors. Technology that is at odds with how humans function often fails

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Surveillance pricing hasn’t always been, which is why a law targeting it should ban it.

          • howrar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            To make the difference you’d have to peddle thousands or hundreds of thousands of individualized discounts

            That’s what they do here in Canada.

            • bryndos@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Yep, store loyalty cards, vouchers, store mobile phone app, and “points” and so on. There are a few ways to do it.