There was an Apple bug that allowed restoring information from their notification system. So Apple leaked info from Apps that used the notifications. From any App. Why is this talking about Signal? Why not a “Apple patches bug that allowed access to E2E encrypted WhatsApp messages”? Why not “bug that allowed access to your call history even after deletion”? Because those are all equally true. What’s reason we are talking about Signal here.
And to add more context: the exact same was true for the other “Signal bug/hack/exploit” articles I mentioned. No actual connection to Signal at all, yet that was always the story told.
Apple fucks up and leaks all private information that passes through their notification system? “Bug that allowed to read Signal messages!” Idiot fell for phishing attempt and logged into a fake website giving someone else full access to their device? “Hacker managed to access XY’s Signal account!”. I left my door standing wide open when leaving to work and got robbed? “Locked doors don’t actually protect your stuff!”
Those 3 statements are equally stupid. I am pretty sure the third one would trigger you to question either my sanity or if I think you are an idiot and why I would try to convince you that doors are useless. Why don’t the other two?
A bug in Apple’s notification system allowed extraction even when the message that triggered the notification was deleted.
This means access you any text you got. This means a list of any incoming calls. This means all your appointments that your phone reminded you of.
And instead we get a story about deleted Signal messages, prominently featuring Signal in the thumbnail and picture while failing to mention any of the other implications of that Apple-specific bug.
How is that accurate or even just sane reporting? Either it’s an incredibly stupid take or there is an actual agenda focusing on Signal here. And when I see several of those (including stuff like people falling for phishing attempts and giving away access to their devices being reported as “Hackers getting access to Signal account”) within just a few days I tend to assume the latter.
The people trying to destroy privacy really want Signal to get smeared and go away. Any time any kind of scandal shows up where Signal was being used it’s always a headline in this light when the majority I have all seen are due to user error and/or stupidity.
How is this story fake?
There was an Apple bug that allowed restoring information from their notification system. So Apple leaked info from Apps that used the notifications. From any App. Why is this talking about Signal? Why not a “Apple patches bug that allowed access to E2E encrypted WhatsApp messages”? Why not “bug that allowed access to your call history even after deletion”? Because those are all equally true. What’s reason we are talking about Signal here.
And to add more context: the exact same was true for the other “Signal bug/hack/exploit” articles I mentioned. No actual connection to Signal at all, yet that was always the story told.
Apple fucks up and leaks all private information that passes through their notification system? “Bug that allowed to read Signal messages!” Idiot fell for phishing attempt and logged into a fake website giving someone else full access to their device? “Hacker managed to access XY’s Signal account!”. I left my door standing wide open when leaving to work and got robbed? “Locked doors don’t actually protect your stuff!”
Those 3 statements are equally stupid. I am pretty sure the third one would trigger you to question either my sanity or if I think you are an idiot and why I would try to convince you that doors are useless. Why don’t the other two?
Wouldn’t call it fake, but I can see how someone would feel a bit cheated by this headline. I do mildly.
Huh? It seems accurate to me.
A bug in Apple’s notification system allowed extraction even when the message that triggered the notification was deleted.
This means access you any text you got. This means a list of any incoming calls. This means all your appointments that your phone reminded you of.
And instead we get a story about deleted Signal messages, prominently featuring Signal in the thumbnail and picture while failing to mention any of the other implications of that Apple-specific bug.
How is that accurate or even just sane reporting? Either it’s an incredibly stupid take or there is an actual agenda focusing on Signal here. And when I see several of those (including stuff like people falling for phishing attempts and giving away access to their devices being reported as “Hackers getting access to Signal account”) within just a few days I tend to assume the latter.
The people trying to destroy privacy really want Signal to get smeared and go away. Any time any kind of scandal shows up where Signal was being used it’s always a headline in this light when the majority I have all seen are due to user error and/or stupidity.