Malus, which is a piece of “satire” but also fully functional, performs a “clean room” clone of open source software, meaning users could then sell, redistribute, etc. the software without crediting the original developers. But I have a hard time with the “clean room” argument since the LLM doing the behind-the-scenes work has already ingested the entire corpus of open source software – and somehow the output of the LLMs isn’t considered a derivative work.

  • Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Hot take: You should be able to create derivative works of open source stuff and earn a living with that. Or be allowed to profit of the open source product.