mudkip@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agoSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moeexternal-linkmessage-square143fedilinkarrow-up1304arrow-down133
arrow-up1271arrow-down1external-linkSent this to my friends flexing a "top 65%" score. The site didn't make it clear that's not a good thing.files.catbox.moemudkip@lemdro.id to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square143fedilink
minus-squaretexture@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·edit-25 hours agoHow could It be more clear? It literally says in a room of 1000 you’re smarter than 345.
minus-squarebrax@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 hours agoThe irony of the whole thing is actually pretty funny
minus-squareSCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoThe funniest part is that only counts if the thousand people are representative of the full spectrum of intelligence. Depending on where you are, you may not even be smarter than 345 people. Trump rally? Smarter than 1000 people.
How could It be more clear? It literally says in a room of 1000 you’re smarter than 345.
The irony of the whole thing is actually pretty funny
The funniest part is that only counts if the thousand people are representative of the full spectrum of intelligence.
Depending on where you are, you may not even be smarter than 345 people. Trump rally? Smarter than 1000 people.