Cult I Mean Group
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 17 hours ago

Your RAM Has a 60 Year Old Design Flaw. I Bypassed It.

www.youtube.com

external-link
message-square
14
fedilink
28
external-link

Your RAM Has a 60 Year Old Design Flaw. I Bypassed It.

www.youtube.com

ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 17 hours ago
message-square
14
fedilink
  • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    All of her thumbnails are literally:

    Photographing something you want to show to everyone

    • Redjard@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 minutes ago

      Females

      jucky.

      Also probably a function of the intended audience. Only happens when content farming stuff that hits a certain audience, and then it’s equally done by all creators. If you’re not an attractive woman you just put someone else in the thumbnail, like someone you interviewed, or if it’s game-related a character.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      90% of youtube thumbnails have a face in them, usually of an exaggerated emotion, and that goes for both male and female youtubers. Many youtubers have confirmed time and time again that the algorithm favors faces by a pretty wide margin, and thus most play that game.

      I’m not a fan of it, I wish they didn’t or the algorithm was changed to not favor it, but I understand why they do it. Though I don’t think it’s particularly gendered as your image claims.

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Having a face on them is one thing. Sometimes the person is the subject of the video, and it’s worth highlighting that in the video.

        Having the person making the video staring at the camera, in a pose that says “look at how attractive I am” is another.

        Also, this is not as hard and fast as you make it out. Here, I’ll post some random examples in my feed:

        • No face
        • Indirect faces for a video game
        • No face
        • Face looking away, subject of video
        • Not really faces
        • Faces from video game subject
        • Staring directly at the camera to make it look like some serious meta video, when it’s really an April Fool’s joke (this is the exception that proves how ridiculous it is)
        • No face
        • Faces, but the main focus of the video

        In fact, I had to dig to find videos that would really qualify:

        • Two faces staring into the camera, but they are properly framed and surrounded by the subject of the video
        • Reaction shot face, but at least it’s not taking up the entire frame
        • Mutahar’s mug behind his junky desk, but that’s all of his videos and I wished he put more effort into his thumbnails and presentation

        Even (most) of the female YouTubers on my feed aren’t falling for it:

        • Earlybird
        • Maangchi
        • Pushing Up Roses, besides the occasion “reaction face”
        • CrystAAHHL, just to show that I’m not cherry-picking, yes, she does the reaction face way too much

        Meanwhile, LaurieWired’s entire catalogue is “look how attractive my face is!” This one doesn’t even have the subject in the thumbnail! It’s just her walking in a park. Also, what’s up with her videos from two years ago? Did she completely change her makeup style just to look more attractive in thumbnails?

        • Numuruzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Ayo i think maybe u just like her face lol

Technology@beehaw.org

technology@beehaw.org

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@beehaw.org

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

  • Free and Open Source Software
  • Programming
  • Operating Systems

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 605 users / day
  • 1.28K users / week
  • 2.78K users / month
  • 6.35K users / 6 months
  • 2 local subscribers
  • 42.7K subscribers
  • 4.94K Posts
  • 71.6K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.org
  • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
  • gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
  • rs5th@beehaw.org
  • coldredlight@beehaw.org
  • Leigh@beehaw.org
  • TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
  • Chris Remington@beehaw.org
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org