It gets my goat that people think it’s a good option. There are plenty of articles explaining some of the many issues with it, but a few are:

  1. It’s run by anti-LGBTQ+ crypto bros.
  2. It has ads right out of the box.
  3. It collected donations towards people who never signed up for them - then held them to ransom in exchange for the kind of information you should never share on the Internet.
  4. They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.
  • Noctambulist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    This! I never understand people who recommend Librewolf or other forks over Firefox just because some default settings are better.

    • Cevilia (they/she/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The problem with Firefox is they inflict stuff on you without giving you the chance to opt in. LibreWolf delays the updates (a few days at most in my experience) to cut out the latest round of slop shit and sponsors. It’s not just about the default settings, it’s about the ongoing curation.