• thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I tried Krita. It’s not not as good as GIMP is. What I will say is, it is pretty good for what it is and offers stuff that GIMP does not have. In fact I wanted to switch multiple times because of the support for Vector layers and non destructive workflows. But I never liked editing or creating images with it. Their text tool is also terrible (or was, I don’t know the current state). Just not a good GIMP replacement for me.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Krita is excellent, but it’s for a different task.

      Krita is for image creation. GIMP is for image manipulation.

      • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I argue that GIMP is for image creation too. It does even better job at this, depending on what type of work you are doing. I don’t like to create pixel (as in retro gaming) graphics in Krita. I am not talented at all, but I can judge the workflow I think. That was just an example off course. We all know Krita excells at creating painted like arts with a pen and brushes simulation.

        • wewbull@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          My point was they have different strengths rather than saying one is better than the other. Use the right tool for the job, and all that.