The hed here is a bit misleading … 40% of total staff is not 40% of an individual job.
Jack Dorsey cited AI as the driving force behind cutting 40% of his company’s employees, but other factors such as a weak crypto market, overstaffing and a declining stock price may also have motivated the move.
Last week, the financial technology company Block announced that it would lay off 4,000 of its 10,000 workers. Dorsey, Block’s CEO, said in a letter to shareholders that advances in AI “have changed what it means to build and run a company”.
“We’re already seeing it internally. A significantly smaller team, using the tools we’re building, can do more and do it better. And intelligence tool capabilities are compounding faster every week,” he wrote. He also said that Block’s business remained strong and that these cuts weren’t an austerity measure.
Can AI operate 40% of a business? Perhaps, but other specters haunt Dorsey’s company.
I’d be surprised if LLMs can handle 40% of anyone’s job. You know what often can? Good, old-fashioned automation. It handles tedious tasks no one wanted to do in the first place and produces improved, predictable and testable results.
It took longer than I expected, but Humans need not apply is becoming more and more relevant. Interesting that he thought it would be the transportation sector first that sees significant job losses. Instead that still hasn’t really taken off yet at scale and its the later predictions that we are now seeing.
What do we do when large sections of society are unemployable through no fault of their own?
To quote Oversimplified “Who wants to start a rebabablution, rebolalution… Dang it”